Is it normal to be this kind of scientist?

I said I was done, but that doesn't mean I'm gone permanently, I have an itch to ask more questions. I'm a scientist (learned science on the internet, extremely complicated), I use logic, Ockham's razor, inquiry, the scientific method and intersubjective theory, experiments and observations in all my science whether you believe it's science or not! So one of the sciences I studied is religious neuroscience, bear with me, this is when I have all my life observed and realized that the soul is in your mind, i.e. touching the brain, the seat of intelligence, the seat of the rational part of the soul, as some religions are rational. But to my mind religion is intelligent more than rational. I also tried my version of biology, and based on it, nutritional science, the latter consisting of the following diet: herbs, herbal teas, alkaline digestive enzymes (carbohydrates of potatoes, vegetables and bananas), tinctures, etc. And my biology is that, based on the Investigative Science Centre, I observed (from an artificial heart) that an unhealthy heart pumps much less blood than a healthy heart. And also, my science of history, which denies conventional history and makes real truth about secular history, it's really a faith-science, a secular faith, and furthermore I studied structuralism by both Saussure and Levi-Strauss, and currently I'm studying phenomenology, the science of consciousness (without intellectualizing, which is OK because the mind makes no sense, it's in fact the most complex part of the body), is any of this normal?

Voting Results
40% Normal
Based on 10 votes (4 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 27 )
  • McBean

    Your monologue has great humorous potential for stand up comedy.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • donteatstuffoffthesidewalk

    can i buy some drugs from you?

    also its its occams razor spel it rite boy

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Hansberger

      I wouldn't sell drugs, but medicines, so the answer is yes! If I possibly have done enough research in the subject, I bought a homeopathy book, and know half the things about homeopathy already. If I open my own clinic in Australia, you're welcome to come in and get diagnosed. :)

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • donteatstuffoffthesidewalk

        judgin by all yallve contributed on this here website itd be a hard pass on yalls interpretationsa science and medicine

        also ive sat thru too many 20 hour flights lately and wouldnt bother makin the trip

        if yallre ever hikin the appalachian trail id be happy to discuss reality with yall

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Hansberger

          Nice, and all my passions in science are the result of painstakingly knowing all of it, but homeopathy I'm still learning.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
  • RoseIsabella

    How do you feel about the word "kook"?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Hansberger

      I like it.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • howaminotmyself

    This isnt science, just a passion of yours. Don't confuse the two.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Hansberger

      I have proof, I believe in science, so what up!

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • howaminotmyself

        Proof, or anecdotes? I live by natural medicine. But the truth is that there is no money in research so it doesnt happen. This proof is only personal experience and storytelling. For it to be science it needs to be peer reviewed and replicated.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Hansberger

          I already made a peer review of all this, be-otch! So it's science. :)

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • howaminotmyself

            whatever, you sure don't come across as being a scientist. biznatchadoodle.

            emoticon

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • Hansberger

              Myrmecology (the study of ants) is a science, and so is ornithology (the study of birds), biology and botany. And I'm doing these things physically, even if it's not a conventional way of being physical. I found out, from my myrmecology, in my peer review, the altruistic gene of ants, and that we should imitate it, as follows: to carry heavy or largish loads either on our persons (our front bodies usually including our clothes, except that ants are naked), or over our backs, that we should go out together and socially with other people, that we should do our work with other people who are also working (for or without pay), and to do all of this without the aim of receiving a reward. That's the industry, social behavior, extroversion and altruism we should emulate as humans, finding out that humans are social creatures. On the other hand the nonconformist ants are introverts and only socialise alone by themselves and only seek company from humans or want some time alone, and not for work or industry, but very simply to relax, chill, be at peace with the world and not have a single care in the world, I call this minority group, the true enlightened social hippie. :) Another behavior we should learn from this ant.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
  • SmokeEverything

    A lot of blah blah but I guess I could see your point. Science is just another religion anyway. Believing things to be true because a wise man said so.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Hansberger

      Most of what I said isn't religion, there are two categories: empirical science and spiritual science, I'm this wise man who says so, because no sage I've ever known over the years was a scientist, except perhaps a few, but wise science is certainly not physical science, not as I know it. I decided on a very few physical sciences to change the subject from the esoteric sciences. I'm also a Darwinian and, as I found out, there are some things we can do morally, as Charles Darwin can prove: to survive and be strong, to act altruistically, let me explain, selflessly helping other people like the chimpanzees have done with other chimpanzees. There's a few, but I'd rather act on this morality. It turns out despite following a scientific moral code people think I've done the wrong thing, well, no, I haven't, I followed the rules of science therefore I'm very right.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • SmokeEverything

        You are most likely not doing the experiments to verify whether or not what you're believing is correct, you just believe that somebody else did it and proved it. Evolution is not proven by any experiment you have done personally.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Hansberger

          almost half of any of what I call science has had me conducting experiments and observations myself, or from my own individual and invented (and distinctive) experience myself, does myrmecology (the science of ants) mean anything to you? I physically got off my ass, sat in a couch and looked at an ant's face under the red microscope myself, and found out, with great pride, (at the age of 13 years) that although extremely sickening, an ant has compound eyes, very few hairs on top of its head, and three rows from top to bottom under its nose, of sharp pointy teeth, and when an ant is dead its mouth is closed shut.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • SmokeEverything

            And how has this discovery shaped your view of the world as a whole, or to the accuracy of how it is presented to the general population?

            Comment Hidden ( show )
  • It's normal and sounds somewhat interesting, although I don't think I agree with some of the ideas OP's suggesting.

    I could be off, but I think this is the same user who posted about starting a cult in a college some months back.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Foxboy15

    5mins into this and I can already tell there's something wrong.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Hansberger

      There's nothing wrong, I've done well.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • lordofopinions

    You obviously have a strong interest in science. You want to know how and why things work. This means you have a high degree of curiosity so it's normal for you.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Hansberger

      You hit the nail on the head. I'm currently, when 2 of the books arrive, studying botany, another science I recently grew an interest in, inspired by seeing this at the Adelaide Botanic Gardens.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • paramore93

    Phenomenology is super interesting.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Hansberger

      Brilliant! Let's study consciousness! :)

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • paramore93

        What kind are you studying? There are so many branches xD

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Hansberger

          I'm studying the original phenomenology, said to be not a doctrine, nor a philosophy, but a style of thought, a method, etc.

          Comment Hidden ( show )