Is it normal to adopt veganism when science proves it's wrong to eat meat?

In my experiment with diets, and haven't eaten eggs other than caviar for over 7 months now, I still had dairy in the diet, very recently I got the impression that a scientist thought it was wrong to eat meat and thinks he can be more of a saint than me by not telling anyone on ethical eating, this I can prove to be missing information, e.g. I'm not that stupid so I read between the lines, that it's wrong to eat meat, it was hard, difficult, but on that journey I eventually gave up all animals whatsoever except to perhaps adopt a pet. And when I very recently went back to The True And Living Church Of Jesus Christ Of Saints Of The Last Days, which I have followed before, finding it hard to adopt its raw food diet, I'm now convinced that this is good for the belly, and have developed my own raw food diet with elements of the nutritarian diet (look it up) and my own traditions in eating, including dark leafy greens, more vegetables, fruits, etc, and nuts, more protein in the diet, and the berry diet, at that occasion I only eat berries. And if not irresistible it's easy to substitute: instead of drinking coffee I would drink fig and banana smoothie (just those two ingredients and water added), and instead of a real pad thai I would eat a raw pad thai which is just as delicious and requires no egg or chicken, this I find to be true and The True And Living Church Of Jesus Christ Of Saints Of The Last Days I find to be untrue, just a sect with extreme beliefs, however, I partially believe in its diet: wheat for humans, and barley if possible, and mild drinks, but I believe I must have hot drinks because I'll never change my liquidarian diet. And this led me to want to be a veganarchist based on a truth of the state of Australia, even of USA, that Australia is celebrating Australia Day with the roasting of an innocent lamb on a barbecue, which isn't food but our friend, and that the hotdogs are the whole slaughtered pig including its arsehole for the consumption of both the Australian and the American public to eat hotdogs, and it's unnessary and harmful to both human and non-human animals, I take an anti-speciesist viewpoint on this and we're better off barbequeing corn on the cob with a knob of Nuttelex (a vegan margarine) than a prawn. This I now feel strongly about, because it's wrong to eat animals. I got used to that, and based on my health, which is no health problem since this diet and lifestyle, I have no problems eating just plants, and to support the cause I publicly and openly wear a 'Plant Eater' maroon-coloured sweater. Considering that science has led me to this, and that for a long time I haven't eaten animals, would that be normal?

Voting Results
44% Normal
Based on 9 votes (4 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 4 )
  • mm6969

    Science never proved its wrong to eat meat. You can live on meat only, for generations. Veganism is not proven to work over multiple generations.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Hansberger

      Science proves it, particularly from a vegetarian scientist, they just want to be more saintly than you. I proved it to myself from my religion (Tibetan Buddhism), although I'll never eat a bacon-based alla pana again, I'll next time ask for a vegetarian one, bacon is deliberately killed for me, does that mean it's just food, to just eat it? No, it only proves it's wrong to eat it, whether it's science or not.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Sure, it's normal. Whatever their reasons, I'm just glad to see that someone is vegan or vegetarian.

    The lessened demand for meat, eggs, and dairy, particularly the factory farmed varieties, is always something I'll support.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Hansberger

      Woohoo! Someone appreciates me!

      Comment Hidden ( show )