Is it normal to be angry at how society treats the childfree?

Totally normal to be angry when people treat you differently because you choose not to have kids. It's your choice, and that's fine! Not saying you are unfit to be a parent, but a lot of people are unfit and they reproduce anyways and create horrible nasty children that turn into horrible nasty adults... who are probably the ones that treat people who choose not to have kids with disdain and belittlement. It's totally your choice and not for everyone! Be angry and put them in their place when they say something to you!

+ The Advisor Not having kids isn't selfish as there is no one to be selfish towards. Selfish would be parents having kids that they clearly shouldn't have.

I agree with you on your point about the sexual deviants. However,I think that there are plenty of people who don't have kids, but are not selfish. I also think it's selfish when people want to have kids without getting married. It's one thing if couples end up getting divorced or if an unmarried couple ends up dealing with a crisis pregnancy, but it's very selfish if someone wants to have a baby without two parents.

That Mtv show, I think it's called Sixteen and Pregnant, is awful!

No one has ever died from saving him or herself for marriage, being chaste or maintaining abstinence.

I agree OP, I hope attitudes to the childfree improve over the years as I for one never plan to pollute the world with any of my spawn.

Depends on what the person achieves in his life. If he does great things, like start businesses, creating jobs and wealth, or makes discoveries, I wouldn't call his life hollow, especially if he's fulfilled by these things. It's a whole set, and having children is just a part of the picture.

I'm just curious as to where you live.

I fully agree with you, I don't really want children yet either.

A lot of people see having families and children as "doing your duty" for society. It's been the case for a long time. That's why bachelors were taxed in Puritan New England and German Pennsylvania.

But society aside, individual people can be just jealous to be having more responsibilies, less time, and be more exhausted than the childfree folks do.

I for one want to have children in the future, like, a lot of them. But I'll only have what I can afford to still keep the living standards high and delegate a lot of the care to the wife and others (nannies, tutors, etc), cause I don't want to be a slave for them either.

I'm pretty eugenic-oriented, and so my view of the childfree depends on the person themselves: if I see they have good traits and could produce some good progeny through both nature and nurture then I think it's a shame they don't reproduce and usually encourage them to do it; if they're useless, uncapable, reckless, destructive, have lots of hereditary diseases, or just don't have many appealing traits, then it might be best they remain childless.

Not having children is not what is selfish. It's having them that is. Think of it, the unborn don't experience any suffering and can't regret not being there to enjoy what little pleasure there is in life but suddenly you get born because two individuals decide to become parents and *bam* you have to suffer through 12 years of school, the competition to find a good job, mates etc and your parents didn't necessarily pass on the genes that makes you come on top of all that competition. It's a dog eat dog world and there's nothing nice about it.
Also, it infuriates me when parents blame their children for not being what they had hoped for. You KNEW it was a genetic lottery and the outcome is unpredictable.

Yes I agree, as a male have to fulfil the "macho role" of having a family is simply boring to me.

Children are parasites
You still believe it's everone's responsibility to "create the future generation?" The world is overpopulated as it is, and kids are annoying. God bless anyone that doesn't have them.

Where do you get that from? How is it "living selfishly for your own needs" to refuse to have children when you know that you don't want children and therefore would not be the parent that child deserves? Isn't that the opposite of selfish? Isn't refusing to bring another child into this overpopulated world the opposite of selfish?
You are forced to grow up and have financial stability just by getting a job and providing for yourself. You give yourself completely to a spouse or significant other as well.
The "ultimate goal of adult life" isn't the same for everyone. It is a great thing that some people are childless.
I've known several people who are parents who act like children and are sexual deviants.
Also, what would you call the people who decide that they need children when they are not financially stable, mature, nor prepared, and haven't even thought it fully through? The people who don't even have a career in place or know what they are doing with their life who think they need to bring a child into that? I've known several people like this. Is it not selfish to bring a baby into this world for the sake of "baby fever" and to struggle to provide for it because you did not have your life together before you decided to have that child? Is shuffling from run-down apartment in a bad neighborhood to another, driving a jalopy car that constantly breaks down and that you can't afford to replace or repair, working multiple minimum wage jobs to keep above the water, etc. because you decided you needed a baby when you weren't ready not selfish or unfair to that child? I've known several people who did this. I even know of people who weren't moved out of their parents' house yet and couldn't even afford to pay liability insurance on their clunker cars and worked part-time at minimum wage-paying fast food joints who thought it was a great idea to bring a child into their mess of a world.
Please don't tell me that you're under the notion that every person is fit to be a parent either.
It's pretty clear that you are very naive about life.

I guess so.

I had children but I ate them.