Is it normal i think native americans need to get over themselves

Sounds a bit like you’re talking of the skinwalker legends too. Which is a few of their people being something akin to shape shifting necrophiliac witches that committed kidnappings and murders for tribes until they all became to frightened to use them any more. As they would turn on their employers at times also. They keep a lot of the lore close to their chests but it’s pretty fucking dark.

But yeah totally, they were a warring and fierce people towards each other’s tribes. When people mention the massacres they forget how many white casualties there were also, a huge amount. They nearly fucked us completely without all the gunpowder, that’s fucking tough.

Let's be honest the native americans never had a chance vs the colonial powers. There were no large animals able to be domesticated so large scale agriculture had to be done using slaves or not at all. A benefit to domesticating animals is the fact that you gain far more immunities to diseases which could of helped the natives (small pox would still be a thing but a greater survival rate would have been probable). Most native american tribes weren't the hippy bullshit people portray them as but as what hunter gatherers societies tended to be, a savage and clan based system with tribes killing babies and anyone over the age of 8, not to mention raping any women they pillaged. Of course most tribes did this so it was more of a "that's what happens when you are conquered" mindset rather than a tribe specific culture.

A unifying force wouldn't of done much, the europeans had the overwelming technological advantage as well as the incentive to keep pushing (riches, converting, land)

Now at least there are STILL pure native americans, not that it helps, for most of human history if your culture gets dominated usually it disappears within a few generations to the new host culture. America through all of its flaws still gave land to the natives, it was crap land but it's still land. Not shedding tears for the massacres because it happened 200-100 years ago and there are more pressing massacres to care about, in war it's all savagery no matter what side. So I'm not gonna side with a particular side when it comes to historical conflicts, they fought well but still lost, that's human nature in a nutshell give the best you have and you still might lose.

Everyone makes choices. Either be paid to live in a third world country or make much more working for a living. If the tribe doesn't have much to offer, then it's obvious the direction one would go in.

It’s also pretty convenient how not a single white person can be blamed for the atrocities of their ancestors, but in the very next sentence they all get to take credit for the good things their ancestors did.

It wasn't just about European invaders handing out smallpox-infected blankets, although there are contemporary documents proving this happened in 1760 and there were later cases of deliberate germ warfare against the Native Americans.

It has been estimated that up to 90% of Native Americans died due to epidemics of influenza, measles, small pox and other diseases that raged through the populations following the arrival of Europeans.

One of the factors that helped the revered Pilgrims (who were actually a bunch of obnoxious religious fanatics) survive and prosper after their very poorly-timed landing at Plymouth was that they found an abandoned Native American village surrounded by fields that had been cleared from the forest. This was typical all up and down the eastern seaboard: Europeans would explore an area and encounter a few Native Americans, but it was clear from the clearings in the forest that there once had been a much larger population. Of course, the Europeans chose to see this as the hand of Divine Providence at work, but it was actually just a case of the Europeans being disease-infested and the Native Americans having no herd resistance to the novel diseases they brought with them.