I don't get it. iin?

The problem is that you are mixing up "most women" and "prostitutes". Women want security (emotional, financial, etc.) If you're going to start a family with someone, isn't it reasonable to seek out a stable environment that's going to stay stable?

Prostitutes, however, sell sex (and only sex) for money. Most women don't sell anything; you enter into partnership with them for the sake of each other and any potential children.

If you think all women are prostitutes, it's no wonder you'd traduce them this way. But in your world, where every woman is a prostitute, what does that make you?

There's an odd dichotomy at play here that makes this a complex issues to discuss, and far from black and white. If you're straight up going for the richest catch you can find and that's all you care about, that's one thing and it isn't good.

It is however perfectly reasonable to want someone stable enough that they won't be depending on you.

BUT, any woman OR man should have the right to choose to stay home and take care of the family rather than being the breadwinner. But that's the sort of thing that requires a mutual agreement and lenghty discussion, not the thing you expect to happen because of arcane standards of how relationships work.

There is research that suggests children who have one parent stay at home can turn out better for it, but whichever parent makes that decision, they're taking a huge risk putting their financial security in the hands of their partner. And of course, if you're a man and try to do this people will question your masculinity, which is just ridiculous.

We gave women the freedom to break out of traditional gender roles, why leave the men stuck there?

im staying out of this one peace out

It's no different from when prehistoric females chose a potential mate who could raise offspring due to their hunter and gathering skills. You often still see it in the animal kingdom across all species including humans.

That makes me think of a guy I dated years ago. He dressed smartly, was so gorgeous and everything. I liked him. Then he told me about an injury he got while playing football. For one year he couldn't work and he spent much money trying to save his foot. He was heavily indepted by the time I met him. I felt bad for him but I was repulse by the thought that maybe I would have to support him. I was quite happy when the story ended.

I don't think they're necessarily whores, just lazy women who refuse to get their lazy asses up and do something with their lives, so they live off men.

Then what is it called when a man lives off of a woman and her hard earned dollar?

I call him "my Mom's boyfriend" but maybe you have a technical term for it that you can share with me.

Well, I never understood women who look for rich dudes, because I've never been attracted to a guy's wallet what's so ever. I can make my own damn money!

On the opposite side of the spectrum there are sugar mommas and lazy men lol I don't even know what you would call a guy like that? I wouldn't really say "women want their parteners to be rich etc.." But "some women etc.." No one wants to be called a whore I guess? I mean, if you're a pervert and you are always staring at women chests, do you want to be call out on being a pervert? Probably not, but I don't know you.. lol

It is human instinct, a whore is someone who puts out for money. Saying someone who wants someone to monetarily take care of them is freaking human nature!! It's not like the cave women were any different, they wanted the best hunter/gatherer/provider. Just some women are dumb enough to fall for love, like me, lol

Whoever wrote this is a moron. If you say all women are whores you are admitting all men are assholes and this is not the case. Yes some women want a rich man but that is not all women.

It extends farther then just not having money, many women today wont bother with certain guys, even perfectly stable, able to provide, all around decent guys just because they arent 6' or more, or bigger then average elsewhere if you know what I mean. I dont know how this mentality came about, but its certainly there. And/Or those guys who are the life of the party (read loudmouth douchebags) women enjoy men like that, because its "exciting" and "dramatic", not to mention the extra attention they get because they are attached to that same guy. Women may say they want stability and to leave the drama behind them, but the fact is the men who are stable come off as "boring" to many of these same women. Perhaps its related back to how emotional women are, which never really changes and because of this and the emotional swings they experience, those guys who are more unstable and unpredictable (bad boys) come off as more attractive and enticing.