Gaming shepard vs chief

I was wonder who you would think would win commander Shepard or master chief any class for Shepard.
2 rounds. Found one Shepard has any armour weapons and or bio tics depending on class and chief has assault rifle magnum and 2 frags
Round 2 no armour full fist fight. They are both a max physical peak
I think Shepard would win round one easy and the second would go to either since they both are at max physical peak and fighting.
Stats
Shepard has extremely powerful shields that can regenerate like chiefs but Shepards armour light and won't protect him much after shield is down and Chiefs will. But Shepard has weapons that are practically plasma that can shoot a supersonic speeds basically. Without armour Shepard is still powerful while chief relies on his armour for protection and strength and speed boosts. Shepard can probably run 20 miles an hour while chief can run at most 35 but when he did he tore his tendons.and at average 20 miles
Shepards omni blade can basically slice through almost all materiAl. Shepard can defeat multiple husks and other indoctrinated aliens with a pistol even when he's practically 90% dead(end of mass effect 3). Chief and Shepard have great reflexes but with arm or chief has a little better reflexes. A flaw in Spartan armour is if the shield is down the Spartan can die frombing shot in the visor they see out of but everywhere else is great defence. And be real if your just s fanboy of just one of these games don't just choose that character because you like that game better

Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 14 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • What the fuck are you people talking about?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Wolverine.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Chief would so win. He's a super soldier, he's fights against entire groups of enemies by himself. Shepard's good but he's not Super soldier level good.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Chief relies on his armour without it Shepard and him would be the same in physical strength

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Shepard uses armour aswell, you know. He also uses a team of three constantly.

        And no, Shepard isn't as physically strong as Chief. Chief was genetically altered to ge in better physical condition than humanly possible.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Shepards armor doesn't alter his strength

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • But it does have the omnitool, which he uses for close-range fighting.

            Chief also has superior strength without the suit due to genetic modification, as all Spartans got.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
    • He can beat a krogan in a fight and a krogan is like superhuman in strength and speed

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • That would be a tough one, cause both are very strong formidable warriors. Both are stronger than the average human, Shepard, due to training from hell (the N7 program is considered one of the most brutal training regimens in the galaxy, with a faliure rate (and to fail is to die!) Nearly 90%. Then again, cheif's training is nothing to sneeze at either. Cheif would have a slight strength advantage due to the genetic engineering and his armor in a way is like wheighted training gear.

    Then again, in the second game, Shepard gains cybernetics courtesy of Cerberus, so that may balance it out. Tough call really.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Marauder Shields

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • I think OP has a bias towards Shepard. However it depends entirely on the level, if its close quarters and chief has the blade I go for him in round 2.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
Add A Comment