Do you think global warming is a fraud?

Please restraint from feeding us your stupidity.

It means all of the weather changes. Some countries get ur heat and u get their cold cuz the wind and water streams are being redirected
U can actually find a good explanation in a lot of articles

With the reflective ice on the Arctic Ocean melting, the sun is now cooking our oceans, and we have already gone past the tipping point. Burning sulphur in the stratosphere (equally in both hemispheres, of course) is just a band-aid response. What we need to do is shut down the gulf steam ocean currents. The disruption to European agriculture would be enormous. It isn't clear that with our higher atmospheric CO₂, that even this would cause the Arctic Ocean winter ice to return to its original extent.

A 14°C warm up is where we're headed in the 22nd century. We should put as many species of tropical coral, fish, and associated microbes in cool water sanctuaries before they are lost forever.

If u get caught up into something and join any kind of group, u kinda exaggerate everything
But yeah we should stop all those emissions like....
I mean just look at New Delhi and Peking. That’s an extreme case, but eh

Molten salt reactors!!

Thorium as a nuclear fuel source isn't nearly as bad as uranium and would be better since thorium is a lot more stable, more abundant, and the byproducts are less harmful. People hear nuclear and all they think about is bombs are bad. The only reason we still use Uranium is because during the cold war era the only nuclear power that received major funding from the government were ones that created plutonium as a byproduct.

Wind and solar farms aren't good for the environment since they take up a lot of land and are subject to weather conditions as well as being expensive. Creating a dam to get power from a river can be just as bad by flooding the local habitat. Tidal we don't really know about how much it can effect the environment, but it can raise EMF in the surrounding area which may effect certain types of fish and tidal energy can be very costly.

I'm not saying we should give up on other forms of energy, but we should wait to try to implement them at large scale till we can at least figure out ways to minimize their effect on the local environments after all it doesn't make sense to save the environment by destroy environments. Nuclear is a good step to at least curbing emissions in the short term if not a viable alternative considering there are only 60 nuclear power plants in the US that make up about 20% of the US's power.

That's a good point palehorse.

For example, I recycle. I do my small part to help and then several articles get published that the local recyclers are actually just taking our recycled goods to the landfill as well.

Burden of proof is on you buddy. Also concern is relative. Compared to other issues in politics, it's not really important.

Exactly the energy powered Tesla cars are still running from energy produced by coal and oil.

They only like to remember the good, fun stuff (Hair, music, fashion). The threat was always there throughout the Cold War. We fought proxy wars against The Soviets in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan (We supplied the Mujahideen who fought against the Russians). There was always the tension and knowledge that it could happen.
I recommend watching a 1988 movie called The Miracle Mile. Starring Anthony Edwards and Mare Winningham. Today it doesn't have the impact it once had because the threat has mostly been forgotten. But in 1988 it was a very plausible scenario.