Charity adverts showing impoverished children annoy me

I find people who can’t type whole words REALLY fucking annoying.

It depends on which specific areas you are talking about. In some cultures young girls are married off and routinely raped by their husbands, abortions are illegal and so they end up having a bunch of kids whether they want to or not.

There are also places where religious leaders have huge amounts of control and influence so contraception isn't possible to obtain, having as many children as possible regardless of your circumstances is what God wants and education can be seriously lacking in any actual science, so you get young people who genuinely don't properly understand sexual reproduction and sexual health.

There's a whole bunch of other scenarios that you come across, these are just two examples, but I'm just pointing out that you're applying a very western first world argument to cultures that are totally alien to this way of thinking. It's more complex than you have stated here.

For what it's worth I do agree with your principles - the world would be a better place if only those have could actually provide had children.

I believe that you have a poor understanding of the world and how much of it operates. I would not hold the parents to blame either in most of the world.

The leaders of the countries or the "religions" in the area... perhaps.

Many times the issues are long term cultural in nature. Having a successful society where there are adequate resources to take care of almost all of the population well is beyond the abilities of individuals to solve.

It takes organized structures to solve those issues. National and Political leaders, Religious or Cultural Leaders, etc. have the ability to make those changes.

A key problem is that far to often they are focused on their own personal power and wealth accumulation instead of lifting up the people they represent.

Now there are exceptions that pop up now and again (and you probably know the names I could cite). The other thing is nothing ever becomes 100%. You can reduce the % of people in poverty; but, you cannot eliminate poverty entirely. Same is true for the middle class, the rich, etc. You can change the percentages. You cannot eliminate any one segment and still have a functional society as there must always be room to move up and down.

I hope that you gain better understanding...

Some of these "help" organizations do a much better job than others. I believe that World Vision does the best work overall. They are also the only Christian based organization that is welcome and allowed to work in many non-Christian nations in the world as they do not insist on an opportunity to convert people to Christianity as a basis for providing help. They are there just to help; and if asked why they may simply answer that its our religious belief that is what we are to do in the world.

If the child’s parents can’t support it, it should die. Shouldn’t have been born in the first place.

If you don't have the ability to THINK and KNOW you can't support a mothafucka but decide to make 10 of them then fuck you. Die.

I normally am against people having children they cant afford. But here there are some important things to consider against that (we still should try to fix but its more complicated):
1: the woman could have been raped, that's also more common in third world countries.
2: they may also lack access to birth control and proper sex ed. People are instinctively driven to have sex so its gonna happen (those things becoming more available is part of the solution).
3: they often need the children to take care of them when they're old because there usually aren't official solutions for that, of course people don't wanna die slowly from neglect (getting elderly homes would be a good step in the right direction).
4: I think things actually change when its almost the entire nation that cannot afford to care for their kids and they would risk practically extinction if nobody had children despite or hard circumstances
5: high child lethality may mean people have like 8 children to ensure at least one of them survive, which they otherwise would not need to, there is to much uncertainty in who will live to grow up (in the long run I think it would lower or reverse population growth if they eg. got diseases more under control)

When I left the UK (3 years ago today) the tele in the evenings had nothing but charity requests on the ad breaks. There are too many of them and the managers of them are all taking huge salaries.