I agree with a majority of what you say, but should it not be equally a womans responsibility to also make sure that she doesn't go around having unprotected sex? I mean it takes two to tango, it's an equally two way street to be sure, right? Obviously a man can easily be at more fault, taking off a condom unannounced to the partner...ect.. but if both parties agree to have unprotected sex , i'd argue that the woman and the man equally made the CHOICE to make a baby, and while i'm not sure it would completely negate the imbalance of the fact that the woman has to carry the baby therefore she gets more say, but i certainly feel it greatly reduces her ability to choose and reverts it at the very least... closer back to the 50/50 mark.
In the sense that if the baby didn't have to be carried by anyone, it would obviously be a 50/50 choice because its made of both of them, its only because the woman has to carry the child and give birth to the child that gives her the edge and I'd agree, right to choose. but ya I just feel like if they both choose in the beginning to make the baby, it kind of takes a bit of that choice away from her...no?
I honestly don't understand women who are sexually active, and don't carry, and use condoms. I'm a Generation-X person who lived through the AIDS crisis time. Most of my friends in college were gay men so the nightclubs we went to even handed out free condoms.
Would you tell the guy you're pregnant if you're going to get an abortion?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I agree with a majority of what you say, but should it not be equally a womans responsibility to also make sure that she doesn't go around having unprotected sex? I mean it takes two to tango, it's an equally two way street to be sure, right? Obviously a man can easily be at more fault, taking off a condom unannounced to the partner...ect.. but if both parties agree to have unprotected sex , i'd argue that the woman and the man equally made the CHOICE to make a baby, and while i'm not sure it would completely negate the imbalance of the fact that the woman has to carry the baby therefore she gets more say, but i certainly feel it greatly reduces her ability to choose and reverts it at the very least... closer back to the 50/50 mark.
In the sense that if the baby didn't have to be carried by anyone, it would obviously be a 50/50 choice because its made of both of them, its only because the woman has to carry the child and give birth to the child that gives her the edge and I'd agree, right to choose. but ya I just feel like if they both choose in the beginning to make the baby, it kind of takes a bit of that choice away from her...no?
--
RoseIsabella
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I honestly don't understand women who are sexually active, and don't carry, and use condoms. I'm a Generation-X person who lived through the AIDS crisis time. Most of my friends in college were gay men so the nightclubs we went to even handed out free condoms.