I'm trying really hard to see it but I'm just not.
There's the boobs of course, and the nipples-huge variation there. Female butts-lots of shapes and sizes. Breast-waist-hip measurement, when it's out of the normal range is pretty damn interesting. Men tend to put on weight in a very similar way but when women gain weight it can go lots of different ways.
You've really made me think here! Thanks for that. I'm going to keep on reevaluating things.
And with men there's muscular variations, chest sizes (caused by fat or muscle), differences in broadness around the neck, shoulders, waist, and belly, butt sizes, hair growth and I'm not even mentioning variations in genitalia. Hair and general bulkiness change pretty drastically from man to man.
I don't know what you mean by women gaining weight in lots of different ways. As I've seen, there's just two ways: belly and not belly.
Really surprised that you confirmed that all we're looking at is breasts. I was trying to avoid reducing women to just boobs n' butts. :P
OK, this is the second time you have essentially put words in my mouth and that stops here if this conversation is to continue.
Anyway, yeah I left out hair variations and genetalia purposely because I think the amount of variations would be equal in men and women. We're talking about areas where men and women would have significant variation specific to the gender here.
Fat distribution is clearly (to me) much more varied in women than men. It just...is. I don't know if I've ever seen a bottom-heavy man. Or a man with huge tits and ass but a tiny waist.
I also said the faces would all be unique, so, no, I have not reduced women to tits and ass.
It's pretty obvious to me that women have a lot more ass shapes and variation in ass proportion than men. That, of course, may be some kind of blindness on my part but after trying to see it I just do not see such drastic and distinct shape/size butts in men.
To me, the normal range of muscular variations don't make much of a difference and that's true with women too. It makes a difference if it's an extreme though. It's more intriguing to me to look at a female body builder than a male one jst because it's so weird. Again, I realize this is my opinion.
One other major thing...pregnancy. The body during different stages and also after pregnancy is quite interesting and obviously uniquely female.
Like I said, I'm still thinking about this. Thanks again.
Sorry if I put words in your mouth with the end of my last post, but I'm pretty sure that was only the first time it happened.
There are a lot more genitalia variations in men, especially to the naked eye, and there definitely aren't equal hair variations. Women are more likely to shave and men tend to grow more hair in general.
I don't notice drastic and distinct variations in the butts of men or women. Maybe I need to do more research...
Muscular variations make a pretty big difference, they can change the shape of the body significantly. Men naturally grow more muscle than women do, they don't have to do anything extreme or become bodybuilders for there to be a visual difference.
I only comment on this because you seem to have a pretty heavy bias against men based on your other comments here. Not only that, but both of the times you said you were reevaluating things, it sounded like you were just talking about how many more variations you found in women.
Which means you're disregarding the point I'm trying to make (and you didn't even have that many variations in mind when you first started commenting).
I'm reevaluating it in my mind, looking at pictures online and in magazines and I'm typing out the results in my comments. I see how my comments might sound like I'm making a case for women but really I am just relaying the conclusions I came to after researching and pondering. Honestly I am terrible at communicating. I say too little, or too much or my tone comes through wrong. I need to work on it.
I truly am trying to see if I had some sort of bias or maybe I'm just ignorant. I sure as hell don't want to pass up an opportunity to learn and grow.
Would you rather look at photos of men or women?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I'm trying really hard to see it but I'm just not.
There's the boobs of course, and the nipples-huge variation there. Female butts-lots of shapes and sizes. Breast-waist-hip measurement, when it's out of the normal range is pretty damn interesting. Men tend to put on weight in a very similar way but when women gain weight it can go lots of different ways.
You've really made me think here! Thanks for that. I'm going to keep on reevaluating things.
--
Anonnet
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
And with men there's muscular variations, chest sizes (caused by fat or muscle), differences in broadness around the neck, shoulders, waist, and belly, butt sizes, hair growth and I'm not even mentioning variations in genitalia. Hair and general bulkiness change pretty drastically from man to man.
I don't know what you mean by women gaining weight in lots of different ways. As I've seen, there's just two ways: belly and not belly.
Really surprised that you confirmed that all we're looking at is breasts. I was trying to avoid reducing women to just boobs n' butts. :P
--
Anonymous Post Author
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
OK, this is the second time you have essentially put words in my mouth and that stops here if this conversation is to continue.
Anyway, yeah I left out hair variations and genetalia purposely because I think the amount of variations would be equal in men and women. We're talking about areas where men and women would have significant variation specific to the gender here.
Fat distribution is clearly (to me) much more varied in women than men. It just...is. I don't know if I've ever seen a bottom-heavy man. Or a man with huge tits and ass but a tiny waist.
I also said the faces would all be unique, so, no, I have not reduced women to tits and ass.
It's pretty obvious to me that women have a lot more ass shapes and variation in ass proportion than men. That, of course, may be some kind of blindness on my part but after trying to see it I just do not see such drastic and distinct shape/size butts in men.
To me, the normal range of muscular variations don't make much of a difference and that's true with women too. It makes a difference if it's an extreme though. It's more intriguing to me to look at a female body builder than a male one jst because it's so weird. Again, I realize this is my opinion.
One other major thing...pregnancy. The body during different stages and also after pregnancy is quite interesting and obviously uniquely female.
Like I said, I'm still thinking about this. Thanks again.
--
Anonnet
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Sorry if I put words in your mouth with the end of my last post, but I'm pretty sure that was only the first time it happened.
There are a lot more genitalia variations in men, especially to the naked eye, and there definitely aren't equal hair variations. Women are more likely to shave and men tend to grow more hair in general.
I don't notice drastic and distinct variations in the butts of men or women. Maybe I need to do more research...
Muscular variations make a pretty big difference, they can change the shape of the body significantly. Men naturally grow more muscle than women do, they don't have to do anything extreme or become bodybuilders for there to be a visual difference.
I only comment on this because you seem to have a pretty heavy bias against men based on your other comments here. Not only that, but both of the times you said you were reevaluating things, it sounded like you were just talking about how many more variations you found in women.
Which means you're disregarding the point I'm trying to make (and you didn't even have that many variations in mind when you first started commenting).
--
Anonymous Post Author
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I'm reevaluating it in my mind, looking at pictures online and in magazines and I'm typing out the results in my comments. I see how my comments might sound like I'm making a case for women but really I am just relaying the conclusions I came to after researching and pondering. Honestly I am terrible at communicating. I say too little, or too much or my tone comes through wrong. I need to work on it.
I truly am trying to see if I had some sort of bias or maybe I'm just ignorant. I sure as hell don't want to pass up an opportunity to learn and grow.
--
Anonnet
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Then I'm probably just assuming too much. I apologize for that, and sorry for drawing out the conversation so long.