Would you rather be very rich, or less rich but also famous?
If you had the choice between being given 20 million dollars, or being given just 1 million dollars but to also be world famous, which would you choose?
You'd be widely famous across the world, but you wouldn't be extremely famous. You'd be about as famous as Giovanni Ribisi or Amy Smart. So you'd be able to go shopping without a hoarde of fans attacking you, you might get one or two people asking for an autograph on an average day out, but that's it. But you'd still be able to get into vip areas of exclusive clubs and you'd have a lot of twitter followers.
You wouldn't be famous for any negative reason like being an instagram model or reality tv star or just being "famous for being famous". You'd be famous for an actual skill like being a sports star, singer, actor, etc. (You wouldn't actually have that skill though, it's just that a lot of fake footage of you performing those skills would be fabricated and everyone will have their memories altered to remember seeing you perform live).
You'd be retired from that career now and would have to stay retired (even if you think you actually are skilled enough to release a new album or act in a movie), but pretty much everyone who knows about you would still respect and think positively of you.
I'd rather have $1 million and be world famous | 2 | |
I'd rather have $20 million but not be famous | 35 |