Ask Your Question today
Trying to prove a point. Going to kick my girlfriends ass on this one.
Obviously being blind is worse than being deaf, and having no arms is worse than having no legs.
There is a right answer.
| Deaf w/ no Arms | 29 | |
| Blind w/ no Legs | 10 |
Blind with no legs. Mobility devices exist. Deaf people require hands to speak. I guess they could learn to lipread but even so.
Or you can get an audio implant. Depending on what kind of deaf you are. As in if it's just you colclia or your physical hearing system and not your brain that is unable to process hearing.
Blind with no legs so I could feel around for a knife to plunge in my neck.
i play the piano so i'd be blind with no legs, although i wouldn't be able to hit the sustain pedal. but i'm sure i could contrive something else to do that. i'd be the next motherfuckin stevie wonder but even more wonderous
Deaf with no arms cause I still am able to use my voice and can already read lips well. Could probably get a prosthetic arm too and if I was able to move the fingers I already have a few years of ASL I’ve learned but again I can still use my voice so..
Had to vote deaf with no arms. Having sex, just assuming it might happen, sounds really bad without legs. Being blind probably wouldn't be too bad, but I'd have to learn braille and I'd have wasted all that money I paid for PRK. I'll just enjoy that golden silence.
Just get type-2 Diabetes and not take care of yourself, you greatly increase your chance of amputation and retinopathy (vision loss.)
Well since both situations would make me an un-dateable burden I'll just go with the one that hurts me less and enables me to see: deaf with no arms. I like seeing all the pretty colors of the world, the foods I eat, and my family members. I need my eyes. XD
Death. I want to keep all of my body parts intact and functional.
On a side note, in the near future we will be able to grow human limbs and other organs probably, so losing one won't ruin your life.
In such a future, you'll br able to replace parts like you would on a car.
Deaf with no arms. I just can't do blindness. I imagine it would impair my functionality more than anything else. Ideally if I had to lose 2 out of the 4 you presented, I would be deaf with no legs.
Either way, I'd pick no brain over both choices, aka, dead.
Deaf with no arms. Currently you can fix both with current technology. Would need to work on the flexibility but with the disibility checks from the goverment that helps pave the way forward.
Eh? What do you mean. I stated my reasons. I can live without my hearing (hell my genetics just might do me in for it) but to live without seeing this beautiful world that's a deal breaker.
...you are dense as fuck. I didn't say your opinion was wrong, you gimboid. Opinions aren't necessarily "wrong". "Facts" on the other hand...
"Currently you can fix both with current technology" Incorrect.
"the disibility checks from the goverment that helps pave the way forward." Also incorrect.
Why not? I'm highly flexible when it come to accomplishing my goals. paving said way was purposefully vague. All I need to do is see my goal and I'm set.
That's the advantage of being reliant on yourself for energy. Cant snuff out my fire until you actually kill me.
Yes because girlfriends dont exsist. Plus you are blind they dont even need to look attractive!
Yeah but the one to come along would probably be so disgusting that she would offend the other senses.
Smelling like rotten fish.
Hellboundly obese.
Has some horrid name like Shalatha.
And though she may be no artist, she could certainly draw flies.
Didn't think of that last part lol. Now I am double sure thats the right answer.