M'kay. Major consideration: Monogamy. Here's why. Human evolution depends on two outcomes of sexual selection.
1) Concentrating the genes of inferior people into loser offspring who will be eliminated from the gene pool.
2) Concentrating the genes of superior people into winner offspring that will fuel evolutionary change of the species.
The problem is that if everybody fucks everybody, you are only creating offspring with high sex drives. Winner and loser genes are not separated. As a species, humanity goes nowhere.
My conjecture says there is an optimal level for sexual drive. Too much and life becomes an orgy. Too little and procreation fails. But, just the right amount and you have monogamy, families, education, better institutions, and a torch of human enlightenment being lifted ever higher thru the centuries.
You're one of the few who rises well to the challenge of critical thinking. I know you won't disappoint me. Your go.
Would the world be better if everyone had lower sex drives?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
M'kay. Major consideration: Monogamy. Here's why. Human evolution depends on two outcomes of sexual selection.
1) Concentrating the genes of inferior people into loser offspring who will be eliminated from the gene pool.
2) Concentrating the genes of superior people into winner offspring that will fuel evolutionary change of the species.
The problem is that if everybody fucks everybody, you are only creating offspring with high sex drives. Winner and loser genes are not separated. As a species, humanity goes nowhere.
My conjecture says there is an optimal level for sexual drive. Too much and life becomes an orgy. Too little and procreation fails. But, just the right amount and you have monogamy, families, education, better institutions, and a torch of human enlightenment being lifted ever higher thru the centuries.
You're one of the few who rises well to the challenge of critical thinking. I know you won't disappoint me. Your go.