Also there's an unnecessary comma in the first sentence which should simply be a period, dividing the sentence into two.
There's also an exclamation mark in sentence two which should not be there.
When the term it is should be used it should be contracted to 'it's' but when there's a possessive for an object its is used.
Basically its is used similar to his and hers.
Will you follow me to the new world? My Children
← View full post
I don't want to sound like a grammar Nazi but I won't follow a "god" who can't even spell infidel right.
--
Takuto
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
Also there's an unnecessary comma in the first sentence which should simply be a period, dividing the sentence into two.
There's also an exclamation mark in sentence two which should not be there.
--
BlackCatsAreAwesome
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
There's more. "It's creator" should be "its creator".
Actually, the whole piece is shit, probably written by an illiterate second grader.
--
BartekIsGod2
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
Actually that part is correct. The apostrophe doesn't make it "It is" the apostrophe is there because the creator belongs to Poland.
--
Takuto
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
BlackCatsAreAwesome
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
When the term it is should be used it should be contracted to 'it's' but when there's a possessive for an object its is used.
Basically its is used similar to his and hers.
That's wrong. It usually works like that, for example, Sally's book, but this is an exception. The possessive is "its".