Not only that, but I'm pretty sure we'll allow euthanasia to the ones that want it, and we will probably place less value on an individual's life, and more value on our own survival.
I could literally see, mainly through over population and resource and finance, individuals dieing on the street, and no one caring.
Is that too negative, or is it reality?
It may not be 100years exactly but very close.
Our world population presently is 7 Billion individuals
Back in 1812 it was ONE billion (just ONE)
In a hundred years from now it will be nearly 20 Billion
Think about that.
It took about 5 Billion YEARS for humans to evolve on Earth and at last become 'human' about 200,000 years ago. And in this 5 Billion years Earthtime we have presently multiplied our population by 7, and by 20 in another 100 years. I mean it took billions of years just to get to one billion, and now it presently doubles every 40years!
Exactly how are schools going to hold 20 more children for each present child in the future? Answer: They won't!
Yes you probably should get involved in this 'info'. Except we actually call them FACTS ;)
Although the future 'info' is actually if we continue the way we are going. Have they got one child per family where you are yet? Over population and lack of resource is a big concern.
haha no we are four siblings.. and the new couples here have at least two ... and that is also because some serious health reasons or rather they also consider it no problem to have more than that...
Twixmix345- Men, so sorry the day I read it I understood completely different.. fuck, you answered it the way I think ¬¬; I mean... I completely agree with you.
Will Third World countries exist in 100 years?
← View full post
Yes.
Not only that, but I'm pretty sure we'll allow euthanasia to the ones that want it, and we will probably place less value on an individual's life, and more value on our own survival.
I could literally see, mainly through over population and resource and finance, individuals dieing on the street, and no one caring.
Is that too negative, or is it reality?
It may not be 100years exactly but very close.
Our world population presently is 7 Billion individuals
Back in 1812 it was ONE billion (just ONE)
In a hundred years from now it will be nearly 20 Billion
Think about that.
It took about 5 Billion YEARS for humans to evolve on Earth and at last become 'human' about 200,000 years ago. And in this 5 Billion years Earthtime we have presently multiplied our population by 7, and by 20 in another 100 years. I mean it took billions of years just to get to one billion, and now it presently doubles every 40years!
Exactly how are schools going to hold 20 more children for each present child in the future? Answer: They won't!
--
o_0
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Twixmix345
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
my god where do you get this much from...info man... impressive info ....you really have much of it..!!
--
Dad
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes you probably should get involved in this 'info'. Except we actually call them FACTS ;)
Although the future 'info' is actually if we continue the way we are going. Have they got one child per family where you are yet? Over population and lack of resource is a big concern.
--
o_0
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
haha no we are four siblings.. and the new couples here have at least two ... and that is also because some serious health reasons or rather they also consider it no problem to have more than that...
We dont come from monkeys sorry to disappoint you.
--
Dad
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Oh, sorry for you its 6,000 years of life on Earth only, and before that obviously even the entire universe didn't exist!
What are you 5?
--
Twixmix345
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Where you around when life was created? :D. I guess not so who knows when it started. And why are there still apes then if we evolved from them??
--
Carlosolrac
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Were*
If you evolved from them you still are a ape, but not an evolved one!
--
Twixmix345
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Dad
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Careful with the grammar police lol. Nope not possible. Pandas transform into Chinese people then? Explain those big animals? And whales? Yeah shutup
--
Carlosolrac
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Twixmix345- Men, so sorry the day I read it I understood completely different.. fuck, you answered it the way I think ¬¬; I mean... I completely agree with you.
Ps.: Had drunk too much beer.
Yes that's correct Carlosolrac.
But more to the point the apes we are directly evolved from are now ALL gone.
Twixmix345's point is the same as saying why are there different fish, or animals or anything!