History proves thats not the case. Often times the most powerful armies did not rape when they conquered. The war of 1812 the british did not rape American women. The Americans and British did not commit mass rapes in WW2. However the Russians did in WW2 and they are now. Its just a fact.
Maybe the winner side of the war is just better at covering up their rape cases so they can appear more heroic? History is written by the winners. And the US army committed a lot of rapes in Vietnam
The Allies won, Russia was part of the Allies. I'm just saying that's a lot behind historical "facts". Often the accuser side is just as bad as the accused.
Yes I dont think thr US is any more innocent than Russia thats for sure. But from what I have seen it seems theres less rapes from US troops than Russians and Ukrainians.
Maybe because you're getting information mainly from American sources? Of course I can't say for sure which military rapes more, but American media is infamously manipulative, especially in times of war. They take any country and then make their country look good in comparison. But when you listen to the stories of people who had their countries invaded by the US, it's way different. At least we can agree that no matter the place, no one should ever had to go through rape ever.
Noooo I dont trust US media. Im not an NPC. I think I am good at shifting through the bs in the media. Ill give you an example of how they manipulate you.
"A new viral video of surveillance footage of election workers in Atlanta POPULARIZED by rudy gulliani and SHARED by white nationalists on youtube..."
See that there already sounds bad. Sounds like some conspiracy bs the way its written. But in reality it doesnt matter WHO popularized it or who shared it. What matters is IF the video is authentic surveillance footage. And if it is the conversation should only be the substance of that footage. See they word it in a way to make their NPCs skeptic right away. "Oh no that was shared by rudy guliani and white supremacists it MUST be fake..."
Why Russians rape
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
History proves thats not the case. Often times the most powerful armies did not rape when they conquered. The war of 1812 the british did not rape American women. The Americans and British did not commit mass rapes in WW2. However the Russians did in WW2 and they are now. Its just a fact.
--
555
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Maybe the winner side of the war is just better at covering up their rape cases so they can appear more heroic? History is written by the winners. And the US army committed a lot of rapes in Vietnam
--
Anonymous Post Author
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
555
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Russia won in WW2. Are you Russian or something? Im not saying Russia is all bad but its just a fact.
--
555
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The Allies won, Russia was part of the Allies. I'm just saying that's a lot behind historical "facts". Often the accuser side is just as bad as the accused.
--
Anonymous Post Author
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes I dont think thr US is any more innocent than Russia thats for sure. But from what I have seen it seems theres less rapes from US troops than Russians and Ukrainians.
--
555
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Maybe because you're getting information mainly from American sources? Of course I can't say for sure which military rapes more, but American media is infamously manipulative, especially in times of war. They take any country and then make their country look good in comparison. But when you listen to the stories of people who had their countries invaded by the US, it's way different. At least we can agree that no matter the place, no one should ever had to go through rape ever.
--
Anonymous Post Author
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Noooo I dont trust US media. Im not an NPC. I think I am good at shifting through the bs in the media. Ill give you an example of how they manipulate you.
"A new viral video of surveillance footage of election workers in Atlanta POPULARIZED by rudy gulliani and SHARED by white nationalists on youtube..."
See that there already sounds bad. Sounds like some conspiracy bs the way its written. But in reality it doesnt matter WHO popularized it or who shared it. What matters is IF the video is authentic surveillance footage. And if it is the conversation should only be the substance of that footage. See they word it in a way to make their NPCs skeptic right away. "Oh no that was shared by rudy guliani and white supremacists it MUST be fake..."
And thogh the Russians did win WW2 they became the media "villains" right after
--
555
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
*though