Just because "men rape" doesnt mean one nationality doesnt do it more than others in war. Women historically have not been in infantry much and they have vaginas so its harder for them to rape... I dont understand the logic here.
The nation with more power to go to wars will rape more, because they will have more access to vulnerable women. This is true especially if the nations they're attacking are way weaker than they are. The logic is that, given the opportunity and the appropriate lack of law enforcement, men of any nationality will do this stuff.
History proves thats not the case. Often times the most powerful armies did not rape when they conquered. The war of 1812 the british did not rape American women. The Americans and British did not commit mass rapes in WW2. However the Russians did in WW2 and they are now. Its just a fact.
Maybe the winner side of the war is just better at covering up their rape cases so they can appear more heroic? History is written by the winners. And the US army committed a lot of rapes in Vietnam
The Allies won, Russia was part of the Allies. I'm just saying that's a lot behind historical "facts". Often the accuser side is just as bad as the accused.
Yes I dont think thr US is any more innocent than Russia thats for sure. But from what I have seen it seems theres less rapes from US troops than Russians and Ukrainians.
Why Russians rape
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Just because "men rape" doesnt mean one nationality doesnt do it more than others in war. Women historically have not been in infantry much and they have vaginas so its harder for them to rape... I dont understand the logic here.
--
555
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The nation with more power to go to wars will rape more, because they will have more access to vulnerable women. This is true especially if the nations they're attacking are way weaker than they are. The logic is that, given the opportunity and the appropriate lack of law enforcement, men of any nationality will do this stuff.
--
Anonymous Post Author
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
History proves thats not the case. Often times the most powerful armies did not rape when they conquered. The war of 1812 the british did not rape American women. The Americans and British did not commit mass rapes in WW2. However the Russians did in WW2 and they are now. Its just a fact.
--
555
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Maybe the winner side of the war is just better at covering up their rape cases so they can appear more heroic? History is written by the winners. And the US army committed a lot of rapes in Vietnam
--
Anonymous Post Author
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
555
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Russia won in WW2. Are you Russian or something? Im not saying Russia is all bad but its just a fact.
--
555
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The Allies won, Russia was part of the Allies. I'm just saying that's a lot behind historical "facts". Often the accuser side is just as bad as the accused.
--
Anonymous Post Author
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Yes I dont think thr US is any more innocent than Russia thats for sure. But from what I have seen it seems theres less rapes from US troops than Russians and Ukrainians.
And thogh the Russians did win WW2 they became the media "villains" right after
--
555
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
*though