You know nothing about history: women may not be as prone to "take up arms" as men, but there are other ways of changing the world for the better and women have always been involved in doing that, both for themselves, their families and society in general.
If you haven't come across truly assertive and independent women, you've been looking in the wrong places or more likely, your misogyny and wishful thinking is blinding you.
Do you remember what the point of this post is? I was making the argument that women, by their nature, are more easily controllable than men are by groups wanting power over mass populations. That's the reasoning why those groups would prefer a feminized western society.
I'm not arguing if men or women have made the world better or changed it. I'm asking you to consider the feminine traits of being risk-averse and being more submissive to authority. Not to mention the obvious: if you want to control a population's growth, of course women are what you want to focus on—guys aren't giving birth.
She proved your whole point with each post she made back at you. You were trying to debate and she was taking it personal, yet another reason why we can't have women put in charge. They take everything personally.
Your use of "50 Shades of Grey" is an excellent example. If women weren't naturally like that, the book would never have approached the success that it had.
Why is western society so feminized ?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
You know nothing about history: women may not be as prone to "take up arms" as men, but there are other ways of changing the world for the better and women have always been involved in doing that, both for themselves, their families and society in general.
If you haven't come across truly assertive and independent women, you've been looking in the wrong places or more likely, your misogyny and wishful thinking is blinding you.
--
felixy
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Do you remember what the point of this post is? I was making the argument that women, by their nature, are more easily controllable than men are by groups wanting power over mass populations. That's the reasoning why those groups would prefer a feminized western society.
I'm not arguing if men or women have made the world better or changed it. I'm asking you to consider the feminine traits of being risk-averse and being more submissive to authority. Not to mention the obvious: if you want to control a population's growth, of course women are what you want to focus on—guys aren't giving birth.
--
Anonymous Post Author
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
She proved your whole point with each post she made back at you. You were trying to debate and she was taking it personal, yet another reason why we can't have women put in charge. They take everything personally.
Your use of "50 Shades of Grey" is an excellent example. If women weren't naturally like that, the book would never have approached the success that it had.