That requires the acknowledgement that they are correct, which is an acknowledgement that I will not make, since they are not correct. Their problem is that they can't tell the difference between a depiction and real life. There are two things that can make any act evil: the action and the intention. With D&D, the action is speaking words, and the intention is entertainment. So, the act is morally neutral. Since the act of creating the depiction is morally neutral, the depiction itself is morally neutral.
There are two possible interpretations for the morality of depictions. There is that of the Satanic Panickers, and there is my own. Any other possible interpretation is hypocritical, since they either allow things that should be considered immoral, or they disallow things that should be considered moral.
The syntax that I have used has been entirely proper; it has not broken a single rule of the syntax of English.
Why has the media, politicians, corporations, etc suddenly changed?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Priests have the ability to forgive sinful thoughts, if the person who has them is repentant, so, yes, it is fine.
--
charli.m
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
How do the priests feel about your witchcraft dabbling?
--
Clunk42
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I do no witchcraft. Witchcraft is one of the sins I am gifted with the grace to not participate in.
--
charli.m
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Most religious nuts consider D&D witchcraft adjacent, at the very least.
But it's FINE. You only scream about the bible when it suits you and say it's not important when it suits your argument.
--
Clunk42
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That requires the acknowledgement that they are correct, which is an acknowledgement that I will not make, since they are not correct. Their problem is that they can't tell the difference between a depiction and real life. There are two things that can make any act evil: the action and the intention. With D&D, the action is speaking words, and the intention is entertainment. So, the act is morally neutral. Since the act of creating the depiction is morally neutral, the depiction itself is morally neutral.
--
charli.m
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Surprise. This is exactly why I dismiss your "arguments".
Also. Syntax. Learn it.
--
Clunk42
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
There are two possible interpretations for the morality of depictions. There is that of the Satanic Panickers, and there is my own. Any other possible interpretation is hypocritical, since they either allow things that should be considered immoral, or they disallow things that should be considered moral.
The syntax that I have used has been entirely proper; it has not broken a single rule of the syntax of English.