Well you kind of are because you missed one key point that makes your question invalid to begin with.
God created the devil to rule over hell, he doesn't destroy him because he wants him there. He needs him there. God is omnipotent, and that means nothing happens that he doesn't want to happen.
Perhaps my question was indeed invalid to begin with from a THEOLOGICAL point of view, but that's not the point at all.
I also don't appreciate you calling me kind of stupid, certainly when there's no reason to. You shouldn't be so arrogant and judgemental (almost) all of the time.
You're asking religious people why god doesn't destroy the devil. There is no other point of view because there's only one god and one devil in their religion.
The objects in your question are theological, so it can't be anything but a theological question. If you change the way they are then the question also becomes invalid because they would no longer be the devil and god, they'd be something else.
So christians can't make an excuse because you haven't asked an actual question about the actual devil and god.
I definitely realize God needs the devil. However, a SHITLOAD of Christians don't. They believe that (like the Bible says) God is love and therefore wonder why he allows the devil to roam free. I merely wanted to hear their pathetic excuses like I said, you moron.
I've noticed that on many threads you are EXTREMELY arrogant and judgemental. I know there are a bunch of spineless weasels here kissing your supposedly "intellectual" ass, but I'm afraid I just have a teensy bit too much backbone for that. You're an assshole and not nearly as smart as you think you are, you smug cocksucker.
C'mon, subservient weasels, thumb me down! See if I give a crap.
"I've noticed that on many threads you are EXTREMELY arrogant and judgemental"
"I just wanted to see what (undoubtedly pathetic) excuse Christians have"
Look those two statements, you appear to be a massively contradictive jerk.
When I'm mean about something it is in jest, just my humour. But you're actually serious, you try to have a go at Christians without knowing enough about their religion to make a coherent argument. I don't claim to be "intellectual" at all, I simply like to read up on things I discuss. I like to know and learn, I suppose you're going to tell me how pathetic learning is next. And to be frank with you, I may not be religious but I sure do see how interesting it all is and believe that everyone is entitled to their beliefs without being seriously abused over it.
And just look at the way you react, cussing me out like a child. And not in a joking way, simply in a belligerent way.
Is it my fault you asked an invalid question just to "see what undoubtedly pathetic excuse Christians have" without thinking it through? No, it isn't. Be mad at yourself, not me.
And it also has nothing to do with backbone, it is the fact that my point is logical and yours isn't even a point at all. It's a simple matter of obvious right over wrong.
"Look those two statements, you appear to be a massively contradictive jerk."
That's bull. There's a HUGE difference between being arrogant and judgemental ONLY in certain instances and having it as a BASIC attitude.
"When I'm mean about something it is in jest, just my humour."
I have no problem with humor of course, not even with crude humor (in fact, that's the kind I enjoy the most), but being called "fucking stupid as hell" isn't especially funny to me. I wouldn't have verbally abused you if you hadn't STARTED by insulting me.
"I don't claim to be "intellectual" at all"
Really? Because I CLEARLY recall you bragging about your I.Q.
"I simply like to read up on things I discuss. I like to know and learn"
So do I.
"I suppose you're going to tell me how pathetic learning is next."
Why the fuck would I?
"I may not be religious but I sure do see how interesting it all is"
Applies to me too.
"everyone is entitled to their beliefs without being seriously abused over it."
People absolutely have the right to be Christian if they wanna. Just like I have the right to mock that (in my view) immoral and idiotic faith.
"Is it my fault you asked an invalid question"
No, of course it wouldn't be IF I asked an invalid question, but I didn't. Small detail.
Why doesn't God just destroy the devil?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
"Wtf are you that stupid lol."
No, I'm not. I just wanted to see what (undoubtedly pathetic) excuse Christians have.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Well you kind of are because you missed one key point that makes your question invalid to begin with.
God created the devil to rule over hell, he doesn't destroy him because he wants him there. He needs him there. God is omnipotent, and that means nothing happens that he doesn't want to happen.
--
BLAh81
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-3
-3
Perhaps my question was indeed invalid to begin with from a THEOLOGICAL point of view, but that's not the point at all.
I also don't appreciate you calling me kind of stupid, certainly when there's no reason to. You shouldn't be so arrogant and judgemental (almost) all of the time.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
You're asking religious people why god doesn't destroy the devil. There is no other point of view because there's only one god and one devil in their religion.
The objects in your question are theological, so it can't be anything but a theological question. If you change the way they are then the question also becomes invalid because they would no longer be the devil and god, they'd be something else.
So christians can't make an excuse because you haven't asked an actual question about the actual devil and god.
That's fucking stupid as HELL.
--
BLAh81
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-3
-3
Look you goddamn retard,
I definitely realize God needs the devil. However, a SHITLOAD of Christians don't. They believe that (like the Bible says) God is love and therefore wonder why he allows the devil to roam free. I merely wanted to hear their pathetic excuses like I said, you moron.
I've noticed that on many threads you are EXTREMELY arrogant and judgemental. I know there are a bunch of spineless weasels here kissing your supposedly "intellectual" ass, but I'm afraid I just have a teensy bit too much backbone for that. You're an assshole and not nearly as smart as you think you are, you smug cocksucker.
C'mon, subservient weasels, thumb me down! See if I give a crap.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
Johnnytherat
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
"I've noticed that on many threads you are EXTREMELY arrogant and judgemental"
"I just wanted to see what (undoubtedly pathetic) excuse Christians have"
Look those two statements, you appear to be a massively contradictive jerk.
When I'm mean about something it is in jest, just my humour. But you're actually serious, you try to have a go at Christians without knowing enough about their religion to make a coherent argument. I don't claim to be "intellectual" at all, I simply like to read up on things I discuss. I like to know and learn, I suppose you're going to tell me how pathetic learning is next. And to be frank with you, I may not be religious but I sure do see how interesting it all is and believe that everyone is entitled to their beliefs without being seriously abused over it.
And just look at the way you react, cussing me out like a child. And not in a joking way, simply in a belligerent way.
Is it my fault you asked an invalid question just to "see what undoubtedly pathetic excuse Christians have" without thinking it through? No, it isn't. Be mad at yourself, not me.
And it also has nothing to do with backbone, it is the fact that my point is logical and yours isn't even a point at all. It's a simple matter of obvious right over wrong.
Good day sir.
-Tommy, king of all cats.
--
BLAh81
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
See More Comments =>
"Look those two statements, you appear to be a massively contradictive jerk."
That's bull. There's a HUGE difference between being arrogant and judgemental ONLY in certain instances and having it as a BASIC attitude.
"When I'm mean about something it is in jest, just my humour."
I have no problem with humor of course, not even with crude humor (in fact, that's the kind I enjoy the most), but being called "fucking stupid as hell" isn't especially funny to me. I wouldn't have verbally abused you if you hadn't STARTED by insulting me.
"I don't claim to be "intellectual" at all"
Really? Because I CLEARLY recall you bragging about your I.Q.
"I simply like to read up on things I discuss. I like to know and learn"
So do I.
"I suppose you're going to tell me how pathetic learning is next."
Why the fuck would I?
"I may not be religious but I sure do see how interesting it all is"
Applies to me too.
"everyone is entitled to their beliefs without being seriously abused over it."
People absolutely have the right to be Christian if they wanna. Just like I have the right to mock that (in my view) immoral and idiotic faith.
"Is it my fault you asked an invalid question"
No, of course it wouldn't be IF I asked an invalid question, but I didn't. Small detail.
u mad bro?
--
BLAh81
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No, why would I be... bro?