Interpretation is one thing. I sometimes lash out but only after certain things, othertimes (such as responding to an initial response) I am told to sound aggressive even though I am not being aggressive, it just comes out that way.
Some people are a bit aggressive initially but I would say that most assumed to be aggressive are just typing how they would speak without aggressive intent.
So, some people need to understand that percieving aggression on here does not mean that aggression has taken place.
I'll give an example of why I will sometimes lash out.
Example:
Person one: -Brings over a topic of discussion-
Person two: I disagree and here is why. (which is fine)
Person one: Well I don't see your arguments are valid, and here is why.
Person two: You're wrong, I'm right, why are you being so aggressive? Why are you not accepting my points?
Person one: No, saying you're right when you can't defend your position is stupid and just because you offer an answer does not mean your answer is a correct one that the OP hasn't already considered and found reason to not see as valid.
Person two: No, you just don't know what you're talking about and are wrong.
Person one: You fucking srs?
Those situations irk me and I think I am justified, as anyone would be, in being irritated by that, as if being given an answer to a question you ask makes ALL answers given to you valid and unable to be seen as wrong when given reason by the question asker.
But, Im going on and on. Some lash out for valid reasons, some don't. You can't exactly figure out the problem if people are going to make excuses for you having a rebuttal to their points.
Why do users lash out at each other? IIN?
← View full post
Interpretation is one thing. I sometimes lash out but only after certain things, othertimes (such as responding to an initial response) I am told to sound aggressive even though I am not being aggressive, it just comes out that way.
Some people are a bit aggressive initially but I would say that most assumed to be aggressive are just typing how they would speak without aggressive intent.
So, some people need to understand that percieving aggression on here does not mean that aggression has taken place.
I'll give an example of why I will sometimes lash out.
Example:
Person one: -Brings over a topic of discussion-
Person two: I disagree and here is why. (which is fine)
Person one: Well I don't see your arguments are valid, and here is why.
Person two: You're wrong, I'm right, why are you being so aggressive? Why are you not accepting my points?
Person one: No, saying you're right when you can't defend your position is stupid and just because you offer an answer does not mean your answer is a correct one that the OP hasn't already considered and found reason to not see as valid.
Person two: No, you just don't know what you're talking about and are wrong.
Person one: You fucking srs?
Those situations irk me and I think I am justified, as anyone would be, in being irritated by that, as if being given an answer to a question you ask makes ALL answers given to you valid and unable to be seen as wrong when given reason by the question asker.
But, Im going on and on. Some lash out for valid reasons, some don't. You can't exactly figure out the problem if people are going to make excuses for you having a rebuttal to their points.