Hmm. You know, I actually hadn't thought of it like that. I didn't think it could be taken as a humblebrag because the general consensus of the post was that she was average and I, myself, was saying I perhaps unfairly had a hard time seeing her as even average after coming to think of someone who looked like her as a bad person (although I absolutely did think that person was beautiful while in love, which I said I had, but I always do that and specified that).
It just seemed _especially_ relevant to mention. Like with any post, if something in my life is relevant to it, I might comment about it provided it doesn't potentially break anonymity, and I almost did. I don't even reveal what state of the US I came from outside of messages. I wouldn't have even said the US but I ended up saying enough to make it obvious in the past. This actually isn't even the first comment I've deleted because of crossing the line. I've come pretty close when mentioning various jobs, etc., and begrudgingly decided to delete them before they were even seen (to my knowledge).
You might be onto something and it triggered some jealousy, but I'm actually pretty sure ItDuz had said he thought she was average before I even commented. I really don't think he was jealous or thought I was humblebragging all the same given the nature of the consensus on the post. For a while I thought he just wanted to make sure it was seen to fuck me over, but that's not it either.
I've come to the conclusion that he just honestly felt I gave a fuck about his opinion and that saying things like "when I'm in love I see my girlfriends as the best there is" embarrassed me, which it clearly doesn't as I'm doubling down right now. I own that shit. Since he can't win a debate with me for shit (and it's absolutely about "winning" for him), he had taken me deleting that as a weird consolation prize and didn't cope well with realizing I'm fine with everything in the post besides the specific details that could fuck me over.
So in his defense, I no longer think it's really a personal _attack_. It's just more denial like with the stone blocks because it had really meant the world to his little heart. Just like it's not hard at all to see why I did what I did, it's not hard at all to see what the blocks were for, but he would have to say he was wrong to admit that.
I absolutely agree he loathes me, it's abundantly obvious, but I also think it's not about me specifically. He just hates being proven wrong. Anyone could be doing what I'm doing instead of me and he would feel the same. It's not hard to out obvious denial which has been the heart of every debate we've ever had. They're the easiest kind of debate there is for the one not denying obvious facts.
It started with his denial of Trump's role in the Capitol riots. It's always about denial. I don't think we've even once debated something that wasn't a matter of denial on his part. It doesn't make me or anyone else particular impressive for pointing out obvious denial.
He outs his insecurities when he uses accusations like "performative" because it's actually what he's low-key doing. While we're fairly anonymous on here there's still a bit of identity attached to our names. If every comment was totally anonymous, he wouldn't even be pretending to believe the blocks were about something else or that I have a problem with him of all people feeling anything is cringe when he knows the blocks were for the pyramids and he knows I'm not ashamed of my emotions, certainly not regarding a fucking social conservative of all people.
It's _usually_ about him as ItDuz specifically, his identity here, not being proven wrong. He's low-key narcissistic as fuck which is why it's so funny to mirror and amplify the same to him because no one hates external narcissism like a narcissist and it makes their skin crawl like nothing else. I've hinted that I do this to him for fun but he completely missed it. Guess the cat's out if the bag now.
Still, we're, myself included, overlooking how this really started in this _particular_ instance. It's not about hatred of me or even of anyone else who might take the time to call him out on his very easily called-out shit. For once it's not even about his profound aversion to being proven wrong. The answer is actually the simplest one of all, right at the root of everything:
He's simply protecting Lloyd regardless of hating me or protecting his ego. He feels he has to because he knows damn well it's usually always him, Lloyd, and WeirdGuyFromTheSouth spewing their viewpoints. When one of them suddenly says "slavery was okay" this is a massive fucking problem and he started acting like a defense lawyer for a drunken client at best and a murderer's mother at worst. He was long before I called him on it. The format was like this.
LloydAsher: Horrible shit
ItDuz: But what you really mean is this right?
LA: Horrible shit
ID: Okay, I'm going to handfeed you an alibi. Please fucking take it.
LA: Horrible shit
ID: But you really mean... like... dude, come on...
Then I called it out. Just imagine that standard he holds me to and imagine the opposite. It's like the saying about what Trumpers say about anything Trump says: He didn't say that, but if he did he didn't mean it like that, and if he meant it like that, others have said worse.
ID: Okay, I'm going to handfeed you an alibi. Please fucking take it.
LA: Horrible shit
ID: But you really mean... like... dude, come on..."
This fucking made me laugh so fucking hard. Omg.
He explained his opinion of the matter of your ex (which for some reason IS RELEVANT) in more detail. I'm not sure if you can see his reply to me since I believe he's blocked you.
But, apparently a humbrag is not what made this interaction...which I wasn't even here for...SO GODDAMN FUCKING EGREGIOUS that it needs to be brought up over and over again, while we keep repeating the celebrity's name OVER and OVER again so anyone who reads it KNOWS exactly what is being discussed...is this
Saying you think the woman you are dating is the most beautiful person in the world to you is apparently incredibly disingenuous. It's performative. And big lie city.
You're supposed to say she's a D minus, at best. So you should be really embarrassed to be attracted to her. CRINGE CITY.
My fiance would never say such disgusting things to me. When I ask him if he likes my dress, he always says "SHUT THE FUCK UP, STUPID DANNY DEVITO WHORE. DON'T MAKE ME GET THE PHONEBOOK" like a normal person. None of this mincing about, telling people they're pretty. That's some straight up pussy bullshit.
Then...because you were so ashamed when you realized how disgusting and SUPER GAY it is to think your own girlfriend is hot, then you got embarrassed, deleted your post and THEN you crafted an entire fake soap opera where you lied and said she uses the site. Because that is such an unbelievable story...you know, to actually tell your SO what you are doing tapping away on the phone & tell them what site you were on. My fiance never reads this site (hey brett, YOU HIDEOUS D MINUS CUNTFACE ;)
So in short, you should never admit to being attracted to the people you date. Gross. And they also definitely don't have internet access...nobody does.
AND THE FUCKING BLOCKS. Why!? Why were the fucking blocks even a thing? Everyone knows what the motherfucking blocks are for. Why is the fucking Pharoah moving motherfucking blocks, goddamnit? We. All. Know. Why. The blocks being a subject of debate is ABSURD.
He didn't block me. I read it. Some very valid points therein. He made me remember some _very_ cringe shit I said.
See, here's the thing. I actually claimed that (get ready to cringe hard) my view of people tends to change based on what I know about them and the experiences I've had with them. In order to explain why my view of a certain someone was perhaps now unfairly low, I had to explain that I had a bad experience with someone that looked almost just like them and that the resemblance made them also somewhat hit by the effect, and to explain why that made a difference, I described the previously mentioned phenomenon and the opposite side of the coin in which I HUMILIATINGLY also once thought she was rather attractive just for so much as looking like someone who I was in love with and thought looked even better than anyone at the time. I actually, and oh my God, this is so cringe, said that in my mind the woman I was with was the prettiest woman in the world.
But it gets worse. See, first I was embarassed about saying I felt like that which would be SUPER GAY, but then ItDuz showed I should actually be embarassed about the LYING. See, obviously this is not a real phenomenon. This doesn't happen. Feelings can't affect perception. Like ItDuz said, maybe Lloyd said his girlfriend is a D- minus because she's a fucking D-. What I described isn't real.
My opinion of both the woman I was with and her lookalike never once went either up or down because something as ridiculous as "feelings" couldn't possibly change that. I mean have you ever even heard of someone's opinion of how someone looks changing with their "feelings"? This certainly isn't a super well-known phenomenon or anything like that.
So he really got me. I was trying to make myself look good. I thought people would read it and think like, "Wow. What a sweet guy. He exhibits normal behavior. He's probably so sweet he's not even a total sociopath."
Is this virtue signaling? Another way I attract "friends" (victims for me to later manipulate) is by claiming such amazing things as like, "I believe slavery is always wrong."
I really lay it on thick with the nice guy act. I'll let you in on a little secret. This one's just going to sound like bullshit because _no one's_ this nice, but believe it or not, I've never kicked a cat as hard as I can for fun. Nope. Not once.
Ha! Just kidding. Like everyone, I have, but I like to include the notion that I haven't along with other unrealistic virtue signaling about things like being inclined to think my girlfriends are pretty and disapproving of slavery.
This is really just the kind of person I am. I understand I have to work on this since I'm Spider-Man and a lot of people like ItDuz look up to me.
It was really getting out of control. My virtue signaling was almost so bad that I was going to claim that I didn't even break out the phonebook and beat the shit out of her on a regular basis. Only reason I didn't claim something that outlandish is because I knew no one was going to believe _that_ much when I'm already claiming slavery is always wrong and shit like that. No one's that nice. I mean who am I? "Jesus Christ"?
why are you atheist? why are you theist?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Hmm. You know, I actually hadn't thought of it like that. I didn't think it could be taken as a humblebrag because the general consensus of the post was that she was average and I, myself, was saying I perhaps unfairly had a hard time seeing her as even average after coming to think of someone who looked like her as a bad person (although I absolutely did think that person was beautiful while in love, which I said I had, but I always do that and specified that).
It just seemed _especially_ relevant to mention. Like with any post, if something in my life is relevant to it, I might comment about it provided it doesn't potentially break anonymity, and I almost did. I don't even reveal what state of the US I came from outside of messages. I wouldn't have even said the US but I ended up saying enough to make it obvious in the past. This actually isn't even the first comment I've deleted because of crossing the line. I've come pretty close when mentioning various jobs, etc., and begrudgingly decided to delete them before they were even seen (to my knowledge).
You might be onto something and it triggered some jealousy, but I'm actually pretty sure ItDuz had said he thought she was average before I even commented. I really don't think he was jealous or thought I was humblebragging all the same given the nature of the consensus on the post. For a while I thought he just wanted to make sure it was seen to fuck me over, but that's not it either.
I've come to the conclusion that he just honestly felt I gave a fuck about his opinion and that saying things like "when I'm in love I see my girlfriends as the best there is" embarrassed me, which it clearly doesn't as I'm doubling down right now. I own that shit. Since he can't win a debate with me for shit (and it's absolutely about "winning" for him), he had taken me deleting that as a weird consolation prize and didn't cope well with realizing I'm fine with everything in the post besides the specific details that could fuck me over.
So in his defense, I no longer think it's really a personal _attack_. It's just more denial like with the stone blocks because it had really meant the world to his little heart. Just like it's not hard at all to see why I did what I did, it's not hard at all to see what the blocks were for, but he would have to say he was wrong to admit that.
I absolutely agree he loathes me, it's abundantly obvious, but I also think it's not about me specifically. He just hates being proven wrong. Anyone could be doing what I'm doing instead of me and he would feel the same. It's not hard to out obvious denial which has been the heart of every debate we've ever had. They're the easiest kind of debate there is for the one not denying obvious facts.
It started with his denial of Trump's role in the Capitol riots. It's always about denial. I don't think we've even once debated something that wasn't a matter of denial on his part. It doesn't make me or anyone else particular impressive for pointing out obvious denial.
He outs his insecurities when he uses accusations like "performative" because it's actually what he's low-key doing. While we're fairly anonymous on here there's still a bit of identity attached to our names. If every comment was totally anonymous, he wouldn't even be pretending to believe the blocks were about something else or that I have a problem with him of all people feeling anything is cringe when he knows the blocks were for the pyramids and he knows I'm not ashamed of my emotions, certainly not regarding a fucking social conservative of all people.
It's _usually_ about him as ItDuz specifically, his identity here, not being proven wrong. He's low-key narcissistic as fuck which is why it's so funny to mirror and amplify the same to him because no one hates external narcissism like a narcissist and it makes their skin crawl like nothing else. I've hinted that I do this to him for fun but he completely missed it. Guess the cat's out if the bag now.
Still, we're, myself included, overlooking how this really started in this _particular_ instance. It's not about hatred of me or even of anyone else who might take the time to call him out on his very easily called-out shit. For once it's not even about his profound aversion to being proven wrong. The answer is actually the simplest one of all, right at the root of everything:
He's simply protecting Lloyd regardless of hating me or protecting his ego. He feels he has to because he knows damn well it's usually always him, Lloyd, and WeirdGuyFromTheSouth spewing their viewpoints. When one of them suddenly says "slavery was okay" this is a massive fucking problem and he started acting like a defense lawyer for a drunken client at best and a murderer's mother at worst. He was long before I called him on it. The format was like this.
LloydAsher: Horrible shit
ItDuz: But what you really mean is this right?
LA: Horrible shit
ID: Okay, I'm going to handfeed you an alibi. Please fucking take it.
LA: Horrible shit
ID: But you really mean... like... dude, come on...
Then I called it out. Just imagine that standard he holds me to and imagine the opposite. It's like the saying about what Trumpers say about anything Trump says: He didn't say that, but if he did he didn't mean it like that, and if he meant it like that, others have said worse.
That's the nutshell this is in.
--
CountessDouche
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
"LloydAsher: Horrible shit
ItDuz: But what you really mean is this right?
LA: Horrible shit
ID: Okay, I'm going to handfeed you an alibi. Please fucking take it.
LA: Horrible shit
ID: But you really mean... like... dude, come on..."
This fucking made me laugh so fucking hard. Omg.
He explained his opinion of the matter of your ex (which for some reason IS RELEVANT) in more detail. I'm not sure if you can see his reply to me since I believe he's blocked you.
But, apparently a humbrag is not what made this interaction...which I wasn't even here for...SO GODDAMN FUCKING EGREGIOUS that it needs to be brought up over and over again, while we keep repeating the celebrity's name OVER and OVER again so anyone who reads it KNOWS exactly what is being discussed...is this
Saying you think the woman you are dating is the most beautiful person in the world to you is apparently incredibly disingenuous. It's performative. And big lie city.
You're supposed to say she's a D minus, at best. So you should be really embarrassed to be attracted to her. CRINGE CITY.
My fiance would never say such disgusting things to me. When I ask him if he likes my dress, he always says "SHUT THE FUCK UP, STUPID DANNY DEVITO WHORE. DON'T MAKE ME GET THE PHONEBOOK" like a normal person. None of this mincing about, telling people they're pretty. That's some straight up pussy bullshit.
Then...because you were so ashamed when you realized how disgusting and SUPER GAY it is to think your own girlfriend is hot, then you got embarrassed, deleted your post and THEN you crafted an entire fake soap opera where you lied and said she uses the site. Because that is such an unbelievable story...you know, to actually tell your SO what you are doing tapping away on the phone & tell them what site you were on. My fiance never reads this site (hey brett, YOU HIDEOUS D MINUS CUNTFACE ;)
So in short, you should never admit to being attracted to the people you date. Gross. And they also definitely don't have internet access...nobody does.
AND THE FUCKING BLOCKS. Why!? Why were the fucking blocks even a thing? Everyone knows what the motherfucking blocks are for. Why is the fucking Pharoah moving motherfucking blocks, goddamnit? We. All. Know. Why. The blocks being a subject of debate is ABSURD.
--
S0UNDS_WEIRD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
He didn't block me. I read it. Some very valid points therein. He made me remember some _very_ cringe shit I said.
See, here's the thing. I actually claimed that (get ready to cringe hard) my view of people tends to change based on what I know about them and the experiences I've had with them. In order to explain why my view of a certain someone was perhaps now unfairly low, I had to explain that I had a bad experience with someone that looked almost just like them and that the resemblance made them also somewhat hit by the effect, and to explain why that made a difference, I described the previously mentioned phenomenon and the opposite side of the coin in which I HUMILIATINGLY also once thought she was rather attractive just for so much as looking like someone who I was in love with and thought looked even better than anyone at the time. I actually, and oh my God, this is so cringe, said that in my mind the woman I was with was the prettiest woman in the world.
But it gets worse. See, first I was embarassed about saying I felt like that which would be SUPER GAY, but then ItDuz showed I should actually be embarassed about the LYING. See, obviously this is not a real phenomenon. This doesn't happen. Feelings can't affect perception. Like ItDuz said, maybe Lloyd said his girlfriend is a D- minus because she's a fucking D-. What I described isn't real.
My opinion of both the woman I was with and her lookalike never once went either up or down because something as ridiculous as "feelings" couldn't possibly change that. I mean have you ever even heard of someone's opinion of how someone looks changing with their "feelings"? This certainly isn't a super well-known phenomenon or anything like that.
So he really got me. I was trying to make myself look good. I thought people would read it and think like, "Wow. What a sweet guy. He exhibits normal behavior. He's probably so sweet he's not even a total sociopath."
Is this virtue signaling? Another way I attract "friends" (victims for me to later manipulate) is by claiming such amazing things as like, "I believe slavery is always wrong."
I really lay it on thick with the nice guy act. I'll let you in on a little secret. This one's just going to sound like bullshit because _no one's_ this nice, but believe it or not, I've never kicked a cat as hard as I can for fun. Nope. Not once.
Ha! Just kidding. Like everyone, I have, but I like to include the notion that I haven't along with other unrealistic virtue signaling about things like being inclined to think my girlfriends are pretty and disapproving of slavery.
This is really just the kind of person I am. I understand I have to work on this since I'm Spider-Man and a lot of people like ItDuz look up to me.
It was really getting out of control. My virtue signaling was almost so bad that I was going to claim that I didn't even break out the phonebook and beat the shit out of her on a regular basis. Only reason I didn't claim something that outlandish is because I knew no one was going to believe _that_ much when I'm already claiming slavery is always wrong and shit like that. No one's that nice. I mean who am I? "Jesus Christ"?
Pun _fully_ intended.
*Webs away (narcissistically)*