Yeah, yeah, yeah, the "good old days". You mean like when men actually did something more than sit at computers all damn day with a pasty complexion, and tending to fat, sitting on the couch after work, expecting their woman to bring them beer and cook their meal, even though they worked all day too?
You mean like when men actually brought home food by risking their lives to kill it, not risking their lives driving their overpriced Beamer to work each day?
You mean like when men still had a pair and would fight for the honor of their women, not "turn the other cheek" when some drunk slob insults their woman?
Yeah, like you are the winner that any woman would consider herself lucky to be with?
Meh. Your comment is just as bad as this post but I am willing to bet my left nut that your comment gets thumbed up while the poster gets ripped apart.
I don't like your comment 'cus:
- Women tend to be on social websites far more than men and men tend to make the majority of outdoor job workers. Likelihood being that women are moreso indoors behind computers than men.
- There are more obese women than obese men.
- "Hunting to feed". Welcome to the modern day which actually makes us have food much easier, again, primarily by men.
- "Fight for the honour"...You're so white knighting here.
- "Turn the other cheek". Yeah because why be civil when you can show some phony display of masculinity of "Argh, u insult woman. Me smash u nao".
- If what you describe is actually what women think, well, the poster of this actually has a point.
No woman is worth risking your life for. Men were better at working hard in the past because they were rewarded with bigger salaries and their family was waiting for them when they got home. What do we have now? A bunch of discouraged men who are treated like disposable furniture. Men didn't change at all. They have the same potential. They only figured out that there is nothing to fight and make sacrifices for anymore. Women haven't changed either. They're just starting to show their true nature because they are provided with the necessary protection from the state to freely express their childish desires. And men are starting to see this.
Nobody wants to be treated like utility.
The only thing I'm going to challenge in the above comment is, "No woman is worth risking your life for". On that we will have to disagree. I would gladly trade my life so that my wife can live, without a second thought. It was the same with all my wives and many of my girl friends. Most have joined me in adventures in various parts of the world and it is my responsibility to keep them safe and insure that they are not injured. Of course the same goes for anyone aboard a vessel I am operating; male, female, passenger or crew.
I didn't suggest it was a woman who did it. If that is what you're trying to point out. It was a group of wealthy people who run the show. Ruthless corporates and government people regardless if they're men or women are to blame for this. Women always say that behind every successful man there is a woman who guides him. Then why do they always put the blame on the man alone when he does wrong to the world? Women also like to brag about how much power they have over men and how they manipulate them. But where does all the power go when men do evil things? Why don't women stop them? Where are their wise women/wives to guide them? Or is it that they just don't care as long as their man provides enough cash to ensure a life of luxury for them?
why are there so many very Stuck Up Stupid Women nowadays?
← View full post
Yeah, yeah, yeah, the "good old days". You mean like when men actually did something more than sit at computers all damn day with a pasty complexion, and tending to fat, sitting on the couch after work, expecting their woman to bring them beer and cook their meal, even though they worked all day too?
You mean like when men actually brought home food by risking their lives to kill it, not risking their lives driving their overpriced Beamer to work each day?
You mean like when men still had a pair and would fight for the honor of their women, not "turn the other cheek" when some drunk slob insults their woman?
Yeah, like you are the winner that any woman would consider herself lucky to be with?
--
[Old Memory]
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
4
4
-
Crusades_
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Meh. Your comment is just as bad as this post but I am willing to bet my left nut that your comment gets thumbed up while the poster gets ripped apart.
I don't like your comment 'cus:
- Women tend to be on social websites far more than men and men tend to make the majority of outdoor job workers. Likelihood being that women are moreso indoors behind computers than men.
- There are more obese women than obese men.
- "Hunting to feed". Welcome to the modern day which actually makes us have food much easier, again, primarily by men.
- "Fight for the honour"...You're so white knighting here.
- "Turn the other cheek". Yeah because why be civil when you can show some phony display of masculinity of "Argh, u insult woman. Me smash u nao".
- If what you describe is actually what women think, well, the poster of this actually has a point.
--
disthing
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Well said.
No woman is worth risking your life for. Men were better at working hard in the past because they were rewarded with bigger salaries and their family was waiting for them when they got home. What do we have now? A bunch of discouraged men who are treated like disposable furniture. Men didn't change at all. They have the same potential. They only figured out that there is nothing to fight and make sacrifices for anymore. Women haven't changed either. They're just starting to show their true nature because they are provided with the necessary protection from the state to freely express their childish desires. And men are starting to see this.
Nobody wants to be treated like utility.
--
thegypsysailor
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
howaminotmyself
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The only thing I'm going to challenge in the above comment is, "No woman is worth risking your life for". On that we will have to disagree. I would gladly trade my life so that my wife can live, without a second thought. It was the same with all my wives and many of my girl friends. Most have joined me in adventures in various parts of the world and it is my responsibility to keep them safe and insure that they are not injured. Of course the same goes for anyone aboard a vessel I am operating; male, female, passenger or crew.
Pretty sure that it was a man who decided to sell out the working class. Your argument has flaws.
--
Crusades_
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
I didn't suggest it was a woman who did it. If that is what you're trying to point out. It was a group of wealthy people who run the show. Ruthless corporates and government people regardless if they're men or women are to blame for this. Women always say that behind every successful man there is a woman who guides him. Then why do they always put the blame on the man alone when he does wrong to the world? Women also like to brag about how much power they have over men and how they manipulate them. But where does all the power go when men do evil things? Why don't women stop them? Where are their wise women/wives to guide them? Or is it that they just don't care as long as their man provides enough cash to ensure a life of luxury for them?