Would it really be fair? His hospital is probably not the only hospital that has such a flawed system of functioning. I understand the concerns about the long term cost. Reform usually costs a lot of money. But, wouldn't the benefits outweigh the costs, at least in the long run?
For instance, look at the reform changes that were made to help disabled people having easier accessibility to places. It used to be that side walks didn't have slopes on them. This made it extremely difficult and sometimes impossible for people in wheelchairs to properly be able to get around. If I am remembering correctly, they brought their concerns to the government. I believe Clinton was in office around that time. Anyway, reform went underway. There's also special public toilet for the disabled as well as disabled parking. Was the reform worth it? Definitely.
You are assuming most or all hospitals work this way. Just because the OP hospital works this way does not mean they all do. Every ER I been to did most urgent to least urgent.
I have seen people with objects literally sticking out of them. People who were on the brink of death and they were always given priority to everyone else. Even if everyone else had been sitting there for hours.
I have also been to the ER as a child and I was never given special Treatment. So if the problem was they took children first whats the point of adding to a hospital that already prioritizes correctly? Since the issue is not happening there.
Since they already dealt with the issue at hand. why do you believe most hospitals ONLY help children? That is just stupid. No hospital should be ran this way. Why do you believe permitting it will fix the issue?
Pouring more money into a failing establishment is not going to make it run more smoothly. So your solution of tossing more money at it and hope it gets repaired will not fix anything.
You assume that this a big enough issue to call for a reform of ALL HOSPITALS. How do you know this has happened at multiple establishments?
Also if they are going to change anything why not just put in regulations for Highest risk first and lowest risk last? Its quicker and cheaper. If you are going to complain about lives it makes no sense to wait with a LONG and costly solution. It will create less possible deaths if they simply change regulations for hospitals.
I never said that permitting it would fix the issue. If I don't agree with something, why would I want it to continue being permitted? That's what reforms are for.
I never said that I believe that most hospitals are ran this way. Though, I highly doubt that this guy's hospital is the only one that follows this system. Didn't you read what the other users said?
Why are kids more important?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Would it really be fair? His hospital is probably not the only hospital that has such a flawed system of functioning. I understand the concerns about the long term cost. Reform usually costs a lot of money. But, wouldn't the benefits outweigh the costs, at least in the long run?
For instance, look at the reform changes that were made to help disabled people having easier accessibility to places. It used to be that side walks didn't have slopes on them. This made it extremely difficult and sometimes impossible for people in wheelchairs to properly be able to get around. If I am remembering correctly, they brought their concerns to the government. I believe Clinton was in office around that time. Anyway, reform went underway. There's also special public toilet for the disabled as well as disabled parking. Was the reform worth it? Definitely.
--
Riddler
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You are assuming most or all hospitals work this way. Just because the OP hospital works this way does not mean they all do. Every ER I been to did most urgent to least urgent.
I have seen people with objects literally sticking out of them. People who were on the brink of death and they were always given priority to everyone else. Even if everyone else had been sitting there for hours.
I have also been to the ER as a child and I was never given special Treatment. So if the problem was they took children first whats the point of adding to a hospital that already prioritizes correctly? Since the issue is not happening there.
Since they already dealt with the issue at hand. why do you believe most hospitals ONLY help children? That is just stupid. No hospital should be ran this way. Why do you believe permitting it will fix the issue?
Pouring more money into a failing establishment is not going to make it run more smoothly. So your solution of tossing more money at it and hope it gets repaired will not fix anything.
You assume that this a big enough issue to call for a reform of ALL HOSPITALS. How do you know this has happened at multiple establishments?
Also if they are going to change anything why not just put in regulations for Highest risk first and lowest risk last? Its quicker and cheaper. If you are going to complain about lives it makes no sense to wait with a LONG and costly solution. It will create less possible deaths if they simply change regulations for hospitals.
--
Avant-Garde
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Avant-Garde
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I never said that permitting it would fix the issue. If I don't agree with something, why would I want it to continue being permitted? That's what reforms are for.
I never said that I believe that most hospitals are ran this way. Though, I highly doubt that this guy's hospital is the only one that follows this system. Didn't you read what the other users said?