We are both biassed in this argument. But when it comes to jobs where one has to take decisions which have a direct impact on the life and wellbeing of the whole of the population, you want the category of people who both represent the majority and are best qualified for this job and who have the best characteristics and qualities they excel at. Which is why you don't have women, because most women tend to take impulsive decisions based on emotions, not logic, which is usually a bad thing in such jobs, you have mostly whites and jews because they are a majority and throughout the history this was the race that has developed scientifically and economically the most, Christians because they are a majority, and heterosexuals because they are majority and because most of the homosexuals day to day behaviour does not inspire abilities in logical decision taking and critical thinking: when you see a camp guy dressed like a woman and walking like he'd be on a catwalk, you tend to highly doubt his decision taking abilities. Therefore, this is how we end up with White, Christian, Heterosexual Males ruling the world.
This is entirely my opinion, please do not get aggressive if you want me to take your opinion into account. Cheers :)
Nah. There are definitely people who can make good decisions from every variety of race and gender. Being a male doesn't make you more qualified to lead.
To say every x of a population is unfit to lead is pretty ridiculous. Not everyone fits a cookie cutter mold. Being born a male doesn't make you any more fit to be a leader than a body builder. Not everyone is replica of the characteristic of their sex.
I didn't say every male is better than every female etc, but MOST males are better than MOST the others. And it is impossible for each individual to be treated based on his sole abilities and characteristics because we just DO NOT have enough time and memory to store so much data about each individual, which is why stereotyping is a lot easier and logical.
Why are gays accepted?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
We are both biassed in this argument. But when it comes to jobs where one has to take decisions which have a direct impact on the life and wellbeing of the whole of the population, you want the category of people who both represent the majority and are best qualified for this job and who have the best characteristics and qualities they excel at. Which is why you don't have women, because most women tend to take impulsive decisions based on emotions, not logic, which is usually a bad thing in such jobs, you have mostly whites and jews because they are a majority and throughout the history this was the race that has developed scientifically and economically the most, Christians because they are a majority, and heterosexuals because they are majority and because most of the homosexuals day to day behaviour does not inspire abilities in logical decision taking and critical thinking: when you see a camp guy dressed like a woman and walking like he'd be on a catwalk, you tend to highly doubt his decision taking abilities. Therefore, this is how we end up with White, Christian, Heterosexual Males ruling the world.
This is entirely my opinion, please do not get aggressive if you want me to take your opinion into account. Cheers :)
--
RBG250
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Nah. There are definitely people who can make good decisions from every variety of race and gender. Being a male doesn't make you more qualified to lead.
To say every x of a population is unfit to lead is pretty ridiculous. Not everyone fits a cookie cutter mold. Being born a male doesn't make you any more fit to be a leader than a body builder. Not everyone is replica of the characteristic of their sex.
--
fredted
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I didn't say every male is better than every female etc, but MOST males are better than MOST the others. And it is impossible for each individual to be treated based on his sole abilities and characteristics because we just DO NOT have enough time and memory to store so much data about each individual, which is why stereotyping is a lot easier and logical.