And maybe Tom Cruise is going to fall from the sky and take me out for cokes.
Once again. I still don't see the logic in having kids and not having a car in a town like this.
(Nor do I see the logic in having kids without even the financial standing to afford a car. How is one to afford a baby and not a car? By your argument, she can't afford a baby, thus decreasing the logic of the situation).
I'll be waiting for you, Tom Cruise. You owe me a coke.
I have to agree with NeuroNeptunian on this one. Regardless of why the child is being born, having children without means of transportation is a huge disadvantage. If she needs to get out of the city quickly (for example, if there's a natural disaster of some sort) I seriously doubt the public transportation system with be up and running. She wouldn't be able to care for/protect her family. It's just not a responsible choice to make.
I suppose... but I'm assuming that you were born some time either in the eighties or the nineties, or the sixties or seventies at earliest. The world is getting progressively smaller, so to speak. People are needing cars more and more.
And what if the Illuminati are stealing my cable? I don't even have cable!
I still don't see the logic in having children and not owning a vehicle in this town. If she can't afford a car then I can't fathom how she will be able to provide for a child. Kids are human beings, not just mistakes to be made. I don't see the logic in having kids without a means to provide for them either.
Who would you give your seat to on the bus?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
And maybe Tom Cruise is going to fall from the sky and take me out for cokes.
Once again. I still don't see the logic in having kids and not having a car in a town like this.
(Nor do I see the logic in having kids without even the financial standing to afford a car. How is one to afford a baby and not a car? By your argument, she can't afford a baby, thus decreasing the logic of the situation).
I'll be waiting for you, Tom Cruise. You owe me a coke.
--
EndlessSuffering
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
......What if her husband got kill? And she has no job? OR The baby was a mistake!
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
NeuroNeptunian
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I have to agree with NeuroNeptunian on this one. Regardless of why the child is being born, having children without means of transportation is a huge disadvantage. If she needs to get out of the city quickly (for example, if there's a natural disaster of some sort) I seriously doubt the public transportation system with be up and running. She wouldn't be able to care for/protect her family. It's just not a responsible choice to make.
--
EndlessSuffering
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
My mother doesn't drive and I turned out fine! But it's not her fault!
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I suppose... but I'm assuming that you were born some time either in the eighties or the nineties, or the sixties or seventies at earliest. The world is getting progressively smaller, so to speak. People are needing cars more and more.
And what if the Illuminati are stealing my cable? I don't even have cable!
I still don't see the logic in having children and not owning a vehicle in this town. If she can't afford a car then I can't fathom how she will be able to provide for a child. Kids are human beings, not just mistakes to be made. I don't see the logic in having kids without a means to provide for them either.