So now we’re back to needing the wall for national security, even though nobody whose job doesn’t depend on Trump liking them agrees that the wall is needed for national security. See what I mean? When the wall isn’t getting built, that’s fine because we don’t need it anyway, we just need to reinforce existing fences and he’s already doing that, he’s doing a great job. But then he takes money away from schoolchildren(which, to be fair, they’re still being treated better than all the children being locked in cages until they can be sold into slavery) and the actual wall itself is super important again.
(Side note: did anyone else notice that list of people on the “Epstein flight logs” circulating conveniently took Trump’s name off and added a whole bunch of people with zero connection to Epstein who just so happened to be vocal critics of Trump? QAnon/pizzagate continues to be just like the abusive spouse who always accuses their significant other of cheating to distract from all the cheating they do. QAnon is protecting the real pedophiles, pass it on.)
Either the whistleblower broke the law by releasing confidential information, or it’s a fake news witch hunt. Either what they said was true or it wasn’t. If it’s fake news, they didn’t leak anything. If they leaked something, then it’s not fake news. It can’t be both. And the only reason whistleblowers are bad news is because they have to blow the whistle at all. The bad news is the thing that they’re blowing the whistle about, not the fact that they’re blowing the whistle. When a person in a position of power over another person blackmails that person, private conversation or not, that’s abuse of power. And it’s no longer just conjecture when the person with the power publicly admits they did it.
I just turned on CNN. They’re talking about how rushing to reopen “could” have negative consequences. This is exactly what I’m talking about. They’re constantly giving Trump the benefit of the doubt, like he means well and it might just be an innocent mistake. There’s no “could” here. Rushing to reopen WILL have negative consequences. But Trump wants to rush to reopen so they have to pretend it’s a valid idea. Saying the media says negative things about Trump is like complaining that a teacher gave a student a C instead of an A when they really deserved an F. They spin everything in a better light than it deserves and come up with excuses for everything. And, like I said, they’re desperate to paint him as presidential and normal. That’s not Trump running as presidential, that’s the media trying to paint him in a favorable light every chance they get.
And I have no idea what Chinese interference even means. Does that have something to do with the Chinese global warming hoax that every other party in every other country believes except republicans in the US, or the Chinese virus that every country in the world has contained except the US? Yes, I’m sure it’s a complete coincidence that TikTok suddenly became a national security threat out of nowhere three years after its founding...right after they made Trump look bad. Not suspicious at all. Surely it has nothing to do with that, and it’s all about the fact that...uh...their parent company also owns a company in another country that was mean to Trump. I guess “national security” is code for “Trump’s precious fee fees” now.
If a company is partially owned by a company in china. The chinese COMMUNIST party has indirect control. That's what COMMUNISM MEANS. Communism takes all businesses that operate inside it. And sure they might be harmlessly operating inside china but that still leaves the opportunity for that goverment to seize its data for any purpose.
Tiktok has gained knowlage on secret US bases, if you dont see how that could be a MASSIVE problem for the United states then you are living in a fantasy land were it isnt common practice to constantly spy on your allies and especially your enemies.
Who do you think will win the presidential election?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
So now we’re back to needing the wall for national security, even though nobody whose job doesn’t depend on Trump liking them agrees that the wall is needed for national security. See what I mean? When the wall isn’t getting built, that’s fine because we don’t need it anyway, we just need to reinforce existing fences and he’s already doing that, he’s doing a great job. But then he takes money away from schoolchildren(which, to be fair, they’re still being treated better than all the children being locked in cages until they can be sold into slavery) and the actual wall itself is super important again.
(Side note: did anyone else notice that list of people on the “Epstein flight logs” circulating conveniently took Trump’s name off and added a whole bunch of people with zero connection to Epstein who just so happened to be vocal critics of Trump? QAnon/pizzagate continues to be just like the abusive spouse who always accuses their significant other of cheating to distract from all the cheating they do. QAnon is protecting the real pedophiles, pass it on.)
Either the whistleblower broke the law by releasing confidential information, or it’s a fake news witch hunt. Either what they said was true or it wasn’t. If it’s fake news, they didn’t leak anything. If they leaked something, then it’s not fake news. It can’t be both. And the only reason whistleblowers are bad news is because they have to blow the whistle at all. The bad news is the thing that they’re blowing the whistle about, not the fact that they’re blowing the whistle. When a person in a position of power over another person blackmails that person, private conversation or not, that’s abuse of power. And it’s no longer just conjecture when the person with the power publicly admits they did it.
I just turned on CNN. They’re talking about how rushing to reopen “could” have negative consequences. This is exactly what I’m talking about. They’re constantly giving Trump the benefit of the doubt, like he means well and it might just be an innocent mistake. There’s no “could” here. Rushing to reopen WILL have negative consequences. But Trump wants to rush to reopen so they have to pretend it’s a valid idea. Saying the media says negative things about Trump is like complaining that a teacher gave a student a C instead of an A when they really deserved an F. They spin everything in a better light than it deserves and come up with excuses for everything. And, like I said, they’re desperate to paint him as presidential and normal. That’s not Trump running as presidential, that’s the media trying to paint him in a favorable light every chance they get.
And I have no idea what Chinese interference even means. Does that have something to do with the Chinese global warming hoax that every other party in every other country believes except republicans in the US, or the Chinese virus that every country in the world has contained except the US? Yes, I’m sure it’s a complete coincidence that TikTok suddenly became a national security threat out of nowhere three years after its founding...right after they made Trump look bad. Not suspicious at all. Surely it has nothing to do with that, and it’s all about the fact that...uh...their parent company also owns a company in another country that was mean to Trump. I guess “national security” is code for “Trump’s precious fee fees” now.
--
LloydAsher
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
If a company is partially owned by a company in china. The chinese COMMUNIST party has indirect control. That's what COMMUNISM MEANS. Communism takes all businesses that operate inside it. And sure they might be harmlessly operating inside china but that still leaves the opportunity for that goverment to seize its data for any purpose.
Tiktok has gained knowlage on secret US bases, if you dont see how that could be a MASSIVE problem for the United states then you are living in a fantasy land were it isnt common practice to constantly spy on your allies and especially your enemies.