My short answer.
Greedy bastards.
Fake news.
Propoganda.
Complacency.
This problem started in the early 70s.
1 Women wanted to work as part of equal rights, as a biproduct.
It now takes 2 incomes to raise a family.
2 The America first crowd was convinced they could build junk, but folks would continue to buy it out of patriotism.
So, Honda, Toyota, Datsun.
Kicked ass and took names.
Quality matters.
3 The people at the top did not want an educated populace.
That's dangerous if your system is corrupt.
So, they made higher education prohibitively expensive.
4 Fake news convinces people to vote against their best interests.
So, even if you work a union job.
Great pay, benefits, medical, and retirement.
Fake news convinces you that unions are bad, and you should vote to end them.
5 treason
Ala Mitt Romney.
He made millions by shipping American factories to China.
Fuck the American worker, he showed the C.E.O.
The 1% how to make a bigger profit.
By shipping jobs to China.
6 Disconnected public,
as long as you have biggy frys and your online connection you think all is well with the world.
These items are a recipe for disaster.
Hope I'm wrong, but.
Need herb.
In relative terms.
It's short.
If I made it shorter it would make little sence.
I try to back up my words, I try to spell things out.
You want short:
Trilateral commission.
The devil.
Jewish interest.
Is that better?
I'm curious, how is needing two incomes to raise a family a byproduct of women working in the first place, as opposed to inflation or some jobs simply not paying enough?
Caster, good point.
But, I think it worked like the frog in slowly boiling water.
Inflation, low pay, high prices.
They rose but folks did not notice.
BECAUSE they now had 2 incomes.
What people used to do by choice.
( 2 income )
They now do, out of necessity.
Because now, 1 income isn't enough.
It's an unintended consequence.
Craster.
I think you just like to argue.
I made several points that contribute to the end result.
You fixate on one and try to nit pick.
It's my opinion bases on fact.
You are free to see things as you prefer.
Lol, while it's true that I enjoy debate, I'm not actually arguing this time. That's simply the point that interested me, as this may be the first time I've heard something like that.
I don't know much about the economy, and I'm curious about different opinions on it. I think you have mostly valid points, though I'm not sure whether to believe you on everything.
who are responsible for lower wages and a shrinking middle class
← View full post
My short answer.
Greedy bastards.
Fake news.
Propoganda.
Complacency.
This problem started in the early 70s.
1 Women wanted to work as part of equal rights, as a biproduct.
It now takes 2 incomes to raise a family.
2 The America first crowd was convinced they could build junk, but folks would continue to buy it out of patriotism.
So, Honda, Toyota, Datsun.
Kicked ass and took names.
Quality matters.
3 The people at the top did not want an educated populace.
That's dangerous if your system is corrupt.
So, they made higher education prohibitively expensive.
4 Fake news convinces people to vote against their best interests.
So, even if you work a union job.
Great pay, benefits, medical, and retirement.
Fake news convinces you that unions are bad, and you should vote to end them.
5 treason
Ala Mitt Romney.
He made millions by shipping American factories to China.
Fuck the American worker, he showed the C.E.O.
The 1% how to make a bigger profit.
By shipping jobs to China.
6 Disconnected public,
as long as you have biggy frys and your online connection you think all is well with the world.
These items are a recipe for disaster.
Hope I'm wrong, but.
--
Nednerb43
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
[Old Memory]
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
NoLifer
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Thats not short.
--
TerriAngel
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Need herb.
In relative terms.
It's short.
If I made it shorter it would make little sence.
I try to back up my words, I try to spell things out.
You want short:
Trilateral commission.
The devil.
Jewish interest.
Is that better?
--
Nednerb43
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
walkingdildo
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yeah im dyslexic so it takes me a while , i also proof read a lot but some stuff slips through ya know
Good old antisemitism.
--
Nednerb43
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Woah there
I'm curious, how is needing two incomes to raise a family a byproduct of women working in the first place, as opposed to inflation or some jobs simply not paying enough?
--
TerriAngel
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Caster, good point.
But, I think it worked like the frog in slowly boiling water.
Inflation, low pay, high prices.
They rose but folks did not notice.
BECAUSE they now had 2 incomes.
What people used to do by choice.
( 2 income )
They now do, out of necessity.
Because now, 1 income isn't enough.
It's an unintended consequence.
--
[Old Memory]
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
In that case, do you think companies took the liberty of increasing prices as a way to cash in on the extra money that families had?
--
TerriAngel
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Craster.
I think you just like to argue.
I made several points that contribute to the end result.
You fixate on one and try to nit pick.
It's my opinion bases on fact.
You are free to see things as you prefer.
--
[Old Memory]
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Lol, while it's true that I enjoy debate, I'm not actually arguing this time. That's simply the point that interested me, as this may be the first time I've heard something like that.
I don't know much about the economy, and I'm curious about different opinions on it. I think you have mostly valid points, though I'm not sure whether to believe you on everything.
@terriAngel seems you hit the nail on the head my freind.