Whis is worse: zoophilia or pedophilia?

There's a mistaken assumption in the question that either of these two options is bad. For example, what's your definition of pedophilia? If you have sex with a 12 year old in the UK, whether consensual or not, your regarded as a paedophile - but if it happens in the Netherlands (and many other countries) as long as it's consensual it's absolutely fine.

As for Zoophilia, no doubt most of those who indulge in it either don't acknowledge what they do as being 'bad', or they regard the assumed perception of the 'badness' attending the act as just part of the excitement.

So - this is a totally pointless question due to the sweeping supposition being made about two subjects which require a much narrower definition for them to be of any value whatsoever.

Who cares? Both are rape and unacceptable.

Zoophilia isn't really bad at all.
People that treat there animals amazingly well, but also have a sexual relationship with them.
It's OK to fry animals up and eat them, but having sex with one that's bad LMAO.

VS.

Having sex with a child.

There's no comparison.

Pedophilia is worse at least in the sense that you get more hatred for it.

Is that Michael or Michelle Dorn?

I love to Pet animals at the Zoo, what is your point?

Zoophilia situation is not that bad at all. You see, my Mac n' Cheese addiction situation has in fact transformed me into a manatee individual. I continue to have intercourse situation with my tranny wife Dorn, and it hasn't been that bad situation.