it would depend on the degree of evil of each one. If someone cons you out of $20 is not as bad if you are conned and get your identity stolen. Or a pimp that is truly ruthless vs someone that only gets fair portion for his protection. It just depends, really.
Which of these kinds of people do you consider the lowest scum?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Really? Can you elaborate?
--
gashlover
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
it would depend on the degree of evil of each one. If someone cons you out of $20 is not as bad if you are conned and get your identity stolen. Or a pimp that is truly ruthless vs someone that only gets fair portion for his protection. It just depends, really.
--
Daugenstein2
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Fair enough! Usually I'm thinking of world class con men. The heavy hitters like Charles Ponzi for whom the ponzi scheme was named after.