Because they are technically incorrect.
This is not the first time that someone has challenged the folks who compile dictionaries or lexicons. In fact, they often do this themselves, and alter definitions to become more precise.
If you look through these reference works, you will find many obsolete or archaic references.
It is still acceptable to use the word 'race', but only in the context of the first set of noun definitions (in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary) or in the intransitive or transitive verb contexts.
PS: Look up the word 'folk' in the aforementioned dictionary, and look at definition 1.
Many people around the world find this usage offensive, distasteful or uncultured.
Please read what Oxford has to say about this divisive term.
They are incorrect in their definition as well.
Humankind does not have major divisions. In fact, we all share a common ancestor (most of us within 16 generations). We also do not have 'distinct' physical characteristics, but relatively minor variation amongst us.
Which group of people do you believe is the most discriminated against
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
TL;DR
Why should the whole world change its terminology to accomodate you?
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Because they are technically incorrect.
This is not the first time that someone has challenged the folks who compile dictionaries or lexicons. In fact, they often do this themselves, and alter definitions to become more precise.
If you look through these reference works, you will find many obsolete or archaic references.
It is still acceptable to use the word 'race', but only in the context of the first set of noun definitions (in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary) or in the intransitive or transitive verb contexts.
PS: Look up the word 'folk' in the aforementioned dictionary, and look at definition 1.
--
charli.m
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No one else has a problem with these words being used. Just you.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Incorrect.
Many people around the world find this usage offensive, distasteful or uncultured.
Please read what Oxford has to say about this divisive term.
They are incorrect in their definition as well.
Humankind does not have major divisions. In fact, we all share a common ancestor (most of us within 16 generations). We also do not have 'distinct' physical characteristics, but relatively minor variation amongst us.
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/race--2
--
robbieforgotpw
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
Twenty demerits for making everyone fall asleep.