Sexuality and religion. Sexuality is one of the biggest most touchy subjects. We can not say you are straight or gay or even talk about it without a war starting. Religion is also another one. Which people justify attacking because of something that happened years ago.
We all need to get over ourselves. Not all Germans are Nazis, not all white people are slave owners, MOST religions have evolved past the JUST WAR. In the old days everyone was sick, crazy or dieing for the most part.
So that means we should judge everyone of you for your past crimes as well. If we look at it that way we should treat all blacks like slaves BUT THEY ARE NOT. People need to get over everyone past. Walk forward to the future.
If a religion to this day believes in hanging people of other religions well that is fucked up. Most religions do not believe in this
even if not agreeing with a certien group of people. Not all people with stupid parents are stupid. Not all children coming from criminal parents are criminals. Not all people coming from doctor parents are going to be doctors.
We all need to stop blaming everything for things they can not fix. It was not our choice to be born into the family we are. It is not our choice if we black, white Hispanic. Move forward to a productive future.
These are both so-called 'racial' categorizations.
Please read my response below, why the term 'race', and it's effects, should be considered Archaic and not used, in this context.
We are all people of various tribes.
There is, in reality, no such thing as a "black" person, or a "white" person. Just people with a varying degree of skin pigmentation and some minor dissimilar genetic and physical traits.
Many persons who are "African", are descended from various Caucasoid tribes.
And ALL Caucasoid people are descended from the Khoisan tribe, from Southern Africa.
I'll be willing to wager, that you can't tell the two skeletons apart, in a blind test.
They don't have a nasal sill? It's a pretty dead give away.
Also you couldn't be more wrong about Caucasions coming from the Khoisan. We come from the non-Khoisan branch of evolution as do all out of Africa populations. I think you must of read a Mitochondrial DNA tree incorrectly. Seriously go back and look it up.
Are you a Doctor of Osteology?
Would you please be more specific, as to the definition of "nasal slit", to which you refer.
There are several foramina near the crista galli and cribriform.
I can find no reference to any disparate olfactory foramen structures, between the two groups cited.
Khoisan people represent 'earliest' branch off human family tree (Wired UK)
Similar to findings from Y-Chromosome studies, mitochondrial DNA studies also showed evidence that the Khoe–San people carry high frequencies of the earliest haplogroup branches in the human mitochondrial DNA tree. The most divergent (oldest) mitochondrial haplogroup, L0d, have been identified at its highest frequencies in the southern African Khoe and San groups.[15][12][16][17] The distinctiveness of the Khoisan in both matrilineal and patrilineal groupings is a further indicator that they represent a population historically distinct from other Africans.
4 a : made or done without sight of certain objects or knowledge of certain facts that could serve for guidance or cause bias <a blind taste test> — compare double-blind single-blind
b : having no knowledge of information that may cause bias during the course of an experiment or test <physicians blind to whether the test drug is administered>
Which group of people do you believe is the most discriminated against
← View full post
Sexuality and religion. Sexuality is one of the biggest most touchy subjects. We can not say you are straight or gay or even talk about it without a war starting. Religion is also another one. Which people justify attacking because of something that happened years ago.
We all need to get over ourselves. Not all Germans are Nazis, not all white people are slave owners, MOST religions have evolved past the JUST WAR. In the old days everyone was sick, crazy or dieing for the most part.
So that means we should judge everyone of you for your past crimes as well. If we look at it that way we should treat all blacks like slaves BUT THEY ARE NOT. People need to get over everyone past. Walk forward to the future.
If a religion to this day believes in hanging people of other religions well that is fucked up. Most religions do not believe in this
even if not agreeing with a certien group of people. Not all people with stupid parents are stupid. Not all children coming from criminal parents are criminals. Not all people coming from doctor parents are going to be doctors.
We all need to stop blaming everything for things they can not fix. It was not our choice to be born into the family we are. It is not our choice if we black, white Hispanic. Move forward to a productive future.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Please describe a "black" person.
Please describe a "white" person.
These are both so-called 'racial' categorizations.
Please read my response below, why the term 'race', and it's effects, should be considered Archaic and not used, in this context.
We are all people of various tribes.
There is, in reality, no such thing as a "black" person, or a "white" person. Just people with a varying degree of skin pigmentation and some minor dissimilar genetic and physical traits.
--
SuperBenzid
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
Even with just a skeleton you can tell the difference of a Caucasian and an African. So yes there is a real difference at the physical level.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Incorrect.
Many persons who are "African", are descended from various Caucasoid tribes.
And ALL Caucasoid people are descended from the Khoisan tribe, from Southern Africa.
I'll be willing to wager, that you can't tell the two skeletons apart, in a blind test.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
anti-hero
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Do you know what the primary difference is, between a Khoisan person and a Caucasoid person?
--
SuperBenzid
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
searchingnow
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
They don't have a nasal sill? It's a pretty dead give away.
Also you couldn't be more wrong about Caucasions coming from the Khoisan. We come from the non-Khoisan branch of evolution as do all out of Africa populations. I think you must of read a Mitochondrial DNA tree incorrectly. Seriously go back and look it up.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Are you a Doctor of Osteology?
Would you please be more specific, as to the definition of "nasal slit", to which you refer.
There are several foramina near the crista galli and cribriform.
I can find no reference to any disparate olfactory foramen structures, between the two groups cited.
Khoisan people represent 'earliest' branch off human family tree (Wired UK)
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-09/24/earliest-human-genetic-split
Ethiopians and Khoisan Share the Deepest Clades of the Human Y-Chromosome Phylogeny
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC384897/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1693320/pdf/15101581.pdf
Similar to findings from Y-Chromosome studies, mitochondrial DNA studies also showed evidence that the Khoe–San people carry high frequencies of the earliest haplogroup branches in the human mitochondrial DNA tree. The most divergent (oldest) mitochondrial haplogroup, L0d, have been identified at its highest frequencies in the southern African Khoe and San groups.[15][12][16][17] The distinctiveness of the Khoisan in both matrilineal and patrilineal groupings is a further indicator that they represent a population historically distinct from other Africans.
Let's hear it.
I don't think you could see the bones in a blind test.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
4 a : made or done without sight of certain objects or knowledge of certain facts that could serve for guidance or cause bias <a blind taste test> — compare double-blind single-blind
b : having no knowledge of information that may cause bias during the course of an experiment or test <physicians blind to whether the test drug is administered>
You were blind, and now you can see!