Which girl is the prettiest combination?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

← View full post
Comments ( 3 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • Hi.

    For me it's not really about the eye/hair color combination. Each girl is unique and I've seen stunningly beautiful sexy girls of pretty much all combinations. I grew up in LA and have dated many models, etc.

    What you are asking is kind of like asking a guy to tell you which girl has the sexyist body while the girls are standing behind a lighted sheet and we can't see them, we see just their outlines/figures.

    A guy can instantly tell you:

    She's a 10, she's 2, she's 5, she's 9, she's 7, etc.

    Meanwhile you drop the sheet and they all have different skin colors and are different races.

    Hmm. Interesting most guys may have a skin color/race preference but they have no problem recognizing which girls have hot and sexy bodies and they want to have sex with them if they don't know the girls race / skin color.

    Point?

    Yes some guys have color preferences but really a beautiful brunette is as beautiful as a beautiful blonde, redhead, etc.

    A hot girl is a hot girl and guys want em.

    I don't think there's a male alive that can honestly say he's only and always attracted to a blonde with blue eyes and he's never felt horny or attracted to a brunette with brown eyes or whatever. It's not reality. It doesn't exist. If it does, the guy has some disorder.

    I also feel that one reason blondes get more attention thus more dates is because they standout because there are less of them in society.
    Also the opposing color factor (an ocean of brunettes vs a few blondes) can play a key role here:

    If you had a black/dark piece of paper and you sprinkled a few white paper bits on top of it then you took a look at it you may notice you're really focusing on the white bits in the foreground. You're probably not focusing on the dark parts in the background. The reverse may also be true. Bright white paper background and a few dark blotches or dark paper bits in the foreground and you're focusing on the foreground and not the background. If the reverse is not true then it probably means the human eye is naturally drawn to lighter colors.

    Look at things you read :
    Dark background with light text OR light background with darker text.

    So:
    When you walk into a room be it a bar, club, school, whatever, there's mostly non blondes so people naturally look at them because they stand out from the background or it's because blonde is a lighter color than all other hair colors and it may be that the human eye is naturally drawn to lighter colors. Probably how the eye works, just like the paper example.

    Just like if you had a room full of blondes and there was only 1 or two brunettes. Guys would probably glance more at the brunettes more often because they're standing out and they are rare. But right now if you performed this experiment it may not work because our society has conditioned us to know that blondes are more rare and thus males may think of them more sexually desirable and valuable. The more exposure of this kind of thing (rarity)-Think if 98% of the girls in society were blondes and only 2% were brunettes probably the stronger it would be. Then it would be the brunettes (or red heads) that guys would consider the big score because of their rarity and not the blondes because 'everyone screws and marries a blonde' and even most of the girls they've dated were blondes making them 'nothing special'. The guys that could bag the few brunettes would become the object of admiration and jealousy of the other 98% of guys that get stuck with the lowly common blondes which everyone else (the losers) has.

    Rarity.

    People place value on rarity be it right or wrong. Acquiring something that most people can't get often makes someone feel better about themselves. Kind of like how wealthy people spend foolish amounts of money on art. Things that absolutely do 'nothing' but make them feel special and unique which is what many people want. I should say it's also true that those things can be investments, but seriously spending millions for a painting is foolish. You could invest that money in real estate or stocks as an investment but there's no uniqueness to that and so you're nothing 'special' in the eyes of the wealthy because ALL OF THEM have rental properties but not many of them have that one of a kind painting.

    If you've got the 'only' Vangough, Renoir/whoever suddenly you're 'SOMEBODY SPECIAL' in your group of socialites and you receive praise and attention for this. That gets guys laid and earns the respect of other guys too because he was the guy able to 'bag' the one of kind rare object of desire.

    It's the rarity that makes it cost so much. If there thousands of originals of the same art then it wouldn't be rare and 'everybody' would have them making no one or the art valuable or 'special' in the eyes of art enthusiasts.

    That's the reason why many guys throw money away buying a really expensive car:
    It's foolish to spend $400,000.00 for a Lamborghini or $1.4 million for a Bugatii or is it?

    That guy gets laid by a lot of hot girls and impresses people and that's what he wants.
    If that's the only way he can do that, then to him it's worth the money cause he's getting what he wants.
    Girls give it up for him because girls know he can 'bring home the bacon' and be a good provider buying them things and provide a great house/lifestyle in exchange for sex and companionship.

    Often times that's probably the only way a lot of those guys can lay hot girls. I often feel bad for them because guys like me don't have to spend a dime on a hot girl for her to get down and dirty :)

    I should add that people also have different values for money, again the rarity thing comes in.

    If you're broke or don't make much money you may think it's insane and incredibly stupid to spend so much money on car - more than most people's homes cost.

    If you're wealthy and have millions of dollars it's just a drop in the bucket and no big deal.

    Short supply = great demand = high cost.
    Over supply = low demand = low cost.

    HTH.

    Comment Hidden ( show )