I have to disagree. I find males far more attractive. I strongly believe your opinion is based on sexual attraction rather than appearance in itself.
If anything, I believe men possess more physical attractiveness than women. Most of the time you can't even see women without their makeup, and a lot of men base female appearance with them having makeup on, which is not what women actually look like.
I considered sexual attraction when I posted it. I think you're right but I couldn't prove it one way or the other because I've never had a different sexuality. In the end, I just didn't mention it but perhaps I should have.
Yeah, I think people get mixed up with it. It is understandable, I mean, I myself find women more sexually attractive, but in most other forms of attractive, I find men (when they take care of their appearance) to be more attractive. Kind of like how you can find art attractive, it doesn't mean you want to fuck the Mona Lisa. Lol.
True. If you look at Michaelangelo's David, it is obviously beautiful and male. I can appreciate it.
Where it's difficult for me is to know whether I'm appreciating something out of sexual interest or aesthetic interest, as you say. I'm not confident in my ability to differentiate why I find something attractive. I know what I feel and I know what I think but that's not enough to be confident I am right.
Which form is more beautiful?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I have to disagree. I find males far more attractive. I strongly believe your opinion is based on sexual attraction rather than appearance in itself.
If anything, I believe men possess more physical attractiveness than women. Most of the time you can't even see women without their makeup, and a lot of men base female appearance with them having makeup on, which is not what women actually look like.
--
dappled
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
KeddersPrincess
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I considered sexual attraction when I posted it. I think you're right but I couldn't prove it one way or the other because I've never had a different sexuality. In the end, I just didn't mention it but perhaps I should have.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yeah, I think people get mixed up with it. It is understandable, I mean, I myself find women more sexually attractive, but in most other forms of attractive, I find men (when they take care of their appearance) to be more attractive. Kind of like how you can find art attractive, it doesn't mean you want to fuck the Mona Lisa. Lol.
--
dappled
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
True. If you look at Michaelangelo's David, it is obviously beautiful and male. I can appreciate it.
Where it's difficult for me is to know whether I'm appreciating something out of sexual interest or aesthetic interest, as you say. I'm not confident in my ability to differentiate why I find something attractive. I know what I feel and I know what I think but that's not enough to be confident I am right.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I hate you. Not much of a person that views statues, but that David now has my obsession. Damn you, Dappled!
Completely agree.