'Caucasian' is not 'beautiful people'. It is supposed to be described as the seemingly original ancestors of the diaspora spread accross/throughout the world , who speak any of the Indo-European dialects [My mother-tongue 'Bengali' is one of them originating from 'Sanskrit' - the Indian counterpart of Latin (both in their respective places have the role of being the 'linguistic mother' - the origin of the diverse vernaculars currently in use)] . To say that 'Caucasian' means 'beautiful people' is like saying 'Aryan' means 'noble' [though it is in fact the sense in which the word 'aryan' is used in literary context , like the use of the word 'noble-silence' in 'Buddhist meditation', without any racial connotation or insinuation to colour , though India is the first country to invoke/put into effect the colour-barrier in the form of 'caste-system' to stop miscegenation and maintain/keep racial genetics intact in its original form . And it is not any propaganda or bigotry , but simple natural pride about one's own identity and beauty and romantic aestheticism to be grateful towards nature for giving a wonderful existence] , thogh the word 'Caucasian' in still used/in use in physial antropology till date as an inescapable, unavoidable and indispensable tool in forensic profiling essential for academic/scientific research.<BR>The word caucasian has deliberately been made non-technical for political reasons to eliminate it as a barrier - an obstacle in the path of globalism/cosmopolitan multiculturalism in this coutry-based political and social world order (which is of course artficial) and replacing the term 'race' with 'ethnicity' - to deal with the coloured world in equal footing , in order to make them equal erasing all natural difference to endorse and promote capitalism to their clients augmenting consumerism.<BR>I like to contend/put forward that : If it is so much irrelevant/inconsequential/farce... then why there is so much roar to prove a few words unconvincing/unreasonable/irrational/illogical and what not. It's a democratic stage/platform and everybody is free to speak out what they honestly feel. No book or any amount of study material can MAKE ANYONE BELIEVE anything. Everything is given in there inside from birth. One has just to cut the edge. No body can be taught anything against nature no matter how much effort is invested in indoctrinatin (brain-washing) and artificial vagaries with the force of law . A baby is the best judge because of being pristine and uncontaminated , who will identify in no time who is beautiful and approachable as a stranger , and who is just the opposite - because she is not 'educated', she just follows her gut feeling (intuition) without any calculation . Beauty and aesthetics are hard facts of reality/practical life in reading the mind of the people looking at their face and appearance (as we are connected to the (physical/material) world / nature only through the senses) , no matter how much bitter it might taste
When you say "white people", who are you referring to
← View full post
'Caucasian' is not 'beautiful people'. It is supposed to be described as the seemingly original ancestors of the diaspora spread accross/throughout the world , who speak any of the Indo-European dialects [My mother-tongue 'Bengali' is one of them originating from 'Sanskrit' - the Indian counterpart of Latin (both in their respective places have the role of being the 'linguistic mother' - the origin of the diverse vernaculars currently in use)] . To say that 'Caucasian' means 'beautiful people' is like saying 'Aryan' means 'noble' [though it is in fact the sense in which the word 'aryan' is used in literary context , like the use of the word 'noble-silence' in 'Buddhist meditation', without any racial connotation or insinuation to colour , though India is the first country to invoke/put into effect the colour-barrier in the form of 'caste-system' to stop miscegenation and maintain/keep racial genetics intact in its original form . And it is not any propaganda or bigotry , but simple natural pride about one's own identity and beauty and romantic aestheticism to be grateful towards nature for giving a wonderful existence] , thogh the word 'Caucasian' in still used/in use in physial antropology till date as an inescapable, unavoidable and indispensable tool in forensic profiling essential for academic/scientific research.<BR>The word caucasian has deliberately been made non-technical for political reasons to eliminate it as a barrier - an obstacle in the path of globalism/cosmopolitan multiculturalism in this coutry-based political and social world order (which is of course artficial) and replacing the term 'race' with 'ethnicity' - to deal with the coloured world in equal footing , in order to make them equal erasing all natural difference to endorse and promote capitalism to their clients augmenting consumerism.<BR>I like to contend/put forward that : If it is so much irrelevant/inconsequential/farce... then why there is so much roar to prove a few words unconvincing/unreasonable/irrational/illogical and what not. It's a democratic stage/platform and everybody is free to speak out what they honestly feel. No book or any amount of study material can MAKE ANYONE BELIEVE anything. Everything is given in there inside from birth. One has just to cut the edge. No body can be taught anything against nature no matter how much effort is invested in indoctrinatin (brain-washing) and artificial vagaries with the force of law . A baby is the best judge because of being pristine and uncontaminated , who will identify in no time who is beautiful and approachable as a stranger , and who is just the opposite - because she is not 'educated', she just follows her gut feeling (intuition) without any calculation . Beauty and aesthetics are hard facts of reality/practical life in reading the mind of the people looking at their face and appearance (as we are connected to the (physical/material) world / nature only through the senses) , no matter how much bitter it might taste