If you are making reference to James 2:10, that not the message of the verse. I think that the Douay-Rheims Bible explains the meaning of that verse far better than I can:
""Guilty of all;": That is, he becomes a transgressor of the law in such a manner, that the observing of all other points will not avail him to salvation; for he despises the lawgiver, and breaks through the great and general commandment of charity, even by one mortal sin. For all the precepts of the law are to be considered as one total and entire law, and as it were a chain of precepts, where, by breaking one link of this chain, the whole chain is broken, or the integrity of the law consisting of a collection of precepts. A sinner, therefore, by a grievous offence against any one precept, incurs eternal punishment; yet the punishment in hell shall be greater for those who have been greater sinners, as a greater reward shall be for those in heaven who have lived with greater sanctity and perfection."
All sins are not equal. The idea that they are is a complete misinterpretation of the Bible. Also, when you say God is pro-baby murder, if you are referring to Genesis 22, notice that this is what happens immediately before Abraham kills Isaac:
"[10] And he put forth his hand and took the sword, to sacrifice his son.
[11] And behold an angel of the Lord from heaven called to him, saying: Abraham, Abraham. And he answered: Here I am. [12] And he said to him: Lay not thy hand upon the boy, neither do thou any thing to him: now I know that thou fearest God, and hast not spared thy only begotten son for my sake. [13] Abraham lifted up his eyes, and saw behind his back a ram amongst the briers sticking fast by the horns, which he took and offered for a holocaust instead of his son."
There have been times where God did kill children, but he was also wiping out the whole rest of the population of the cities they were in as well.
I doubt your claim about more abortions taking place where abortions are illegal.
I can see the problem here, Clunk. Malicious sperm homicide also breaks a link of the chain, according to your Catholic interpretation. And through neglect, you have wiped out millions of spermlets through your grievous nocturnal emissions. Your great anxiety that you will never reach heaven is gravely warranted.
You are starting to realize what God has known since the beginning of time; which is that your name is NOT in the Book of the Living.
Sleep ejaculation is not a sin, as it is not intended. To claim that it is a sin is like claiming that letting your neighbor get shot in the middle of the night by a criminal without knowing that the criminal was there is a sin. Predestination is a false doctrine that promotes nothing but foolishness and laziness. The truth will be revealed on the day of judgement.
Well, you are not going to heaven. For a clearer view of the future I looked in to my crystal ball. I could see you on your death bed. Then, your soul left your body and started descending into the shaft of a volcano. You smelled the caustic sulphur out fumes which relaxed you due to your eproctophilia. As you got closer to the bottom, the shrieking and howling of the damned became louder.
Upon arrival, spirits were being sodomized for torture. Your job was reading the bible to them. This contributed to their agony because it was too late to help them. But, your job helped you have a huge superiority attitude.
Fast forward and it was time to throw the damned into the lake of fire for the second death. You were enjoying watching it all. Finally, you were the only one left. I sensed you would be sent to a neutral place with no pleasure or pain, like a refrigeration of your soul in nothingness at the bottom of a cold ocean abyss.
Then, my crystal ball went blank. I know nothing more.
There's nothing I can argue with from that reply because it was entirely made up. If it were true, you'd have to use a crystal ball to call upon the devil to give you glimpses of the future. You also continue to claim that you know whether or not someone is damned, which is a sin. If what you claim to have done and seen is correct, you are more likely to have damned yourself than to have proven my damnation. Also, if you did see such a thing, you would be able to describe in detail what I look like, but I know that you cannot describe what I look like in detail, since you did not actually see anything you claim to have seen.
I do not know if someone is damned. But I do know you should be very very worried about going to heaven. That said, in my vision, you did not suffer in hell. You found it mildly enjoyable in a strange way. I am only speculating about your resting place at the bottom of a cold ocean abyss. I did not actually see that.
You claim to know what I have seen, but you do not know. All the more reason that you should be very worried. Your eproctophilia is a "sign" that your soul is preparing itself for the fumes of hell. I only hope that you wake up from this horrible dream you are living. There is still time.
Everyone should be trying to get to Heaven, as few do. That's not even how Hell works. No one is happy in Hell: not the devil, not his angels, and not humans. Hell isn't even cold; it's full of fire. Eproctophilia is nothing more than a temptation from the devil. Your attempting to read signs where there are none is not a moral practice. I know that you did not see what you claim to have, and you have even proven that I was correct in saying that you did not see what you claimed to have. Claiming to have seen something that you did not see is lying, and lying about something like the fate of someone's soul is a mortal sin.
What would your anti-piracy measure be if you made a video game?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
If you are making reference to James 2:10, that not the message of the verse. I think that the Douay-Rheims Bible explains the meaning of that verse far better than I can:
""Guilty of all;": That is, he becomes a transgressor of the law in such a manner, that the observing of all other points will not avail him to salvation; for he despises the lawgiver, and breaks through the great and general commandment of charity, even by one mortal sin. For all the precepts of the law are to be considered as one total and entire law, and as it were a chain of precepts, where, by breaking one link of this chain, the whole chain is broken, or the integrity of the law consisting of a collection of precepts. A sinner, therefore, by a grievous offence against any one precept, incurs eternal punishment; yet the punishment in hell shall be greater for those who have been greater sinners, as a greater reward shall be for those in heaven who have lived with greater sanctity and perfection."
All sins are not equal. The idea that they are is a complete misinterpretation of the Bible. Also, when you say God is pro-baby murder, if you are referring to Genesis 22, notice that this is what happens immediately before Abraham kills Isaac:
"[10] And he put forth his hand and took the sword, to sacrifice his son.
[11] And behold an angel of the Lord from heaven called to him, saying: Abraham, Abraham. And he answered: Here I am. [12] And he said to him: Lay not thy hand upon the boy, neither do thou any thing to him: now I know that thou fearest God, and hast not spared thy only begotten son for my sake. [13] Abraham lifted up his eyes, and saw behind his back a ram amongst the briers sticking fast by the horns, which he took and offered for a holocaust instead of his son."
There have been times where God did kill children, but he was also wiping out the whole rest of the population of the cities they were in as well.
I doubt your claim about more abortions taking place where abortions are illegal.
--
Bazinga
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I can see the problem here, Clunk. Malicious sperm homicide also breaks a link of the chain, according to your Catholic interpretation. And through neglect, you have wiped out millions of spermlets through your grievous nocturnal emissions. Your great anxiety that you will never reach heaven is gravely warranted.
You are starting to realize what God has known since the beginning of time; which is that your name is NOT in the Book of the Living.
--
Clunk42
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Sleep ejaculation is not a sin, as it is not intended. To claim that it is a sin is like claiming that letting your neighbor get shot in the middle of the night by a criminal without knowing that the criminal was there is a sin. Predestination is a false doctrine that promotes nothing but foolishness and laziness. The truth will be revealed on the day of judgement.
--
Bazinga
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Well, you are not going to heaven. For a clearer view of the future I looked in to my crystal ball. I could see you on your death bed. Then, your soul left your body and started descending into the shaft of a volcano. You smelled the caustic sulphur out fumes which relaxed you due to your eproctophilia. As you got closer to the bottom, the shrieking and howling of the damned became louder.
Upon arrival, spirits were being sodomized for torture. Your job was reading the bible to them. This contributed to their agony because it was too late to help them. But, your job helped you have a huge superiority attitude.
Fast forward and it was time to throw the damned into the lake of fire for the second death. You were enjoying watching it all. Finally, you were the only one left. I sensed you would be sent to a neutral place with no pleasure or pain, like a refrigeration of your soul in nothingness at the bottom of a cold ocean abyss.
Then, my crystal ball went blank. I know nothing more.
--
Clunk42
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
There's nothing I can argue with from that reply because it was entirely made up. If it were true, you'd have to use a crystal ball to call upon the devil to give you glimpses of the future. You also continue to claim that you know whether or not someone is damned, which is a sin. If what you claim to have done and seen is correct, you are more likely to have damned yourself than to have proven my damnation. Also, if you did see such a thing, you would be able to describe in detail what I look like, but I know that you cannot describe what I look like in detail, since you did not actually see anything you claim to have seen.
--
Bazinga
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I do not know if someone is damned. But I do know you should be very very worried about going to heaven. That said, in my vision, you did not suffer in hell. You found it mildly enjoyable in a strange way. I am only speculating about your resting place at the bottom of a cold ocean abyss. I did not actually see that.
You claim to know what I have seen, but you do not know. All the more reason that you should be very worried. Your eproctophilia is a "sign" that your soul is preparing itself for the fumes of hell. I only hope that you wake up from this horrible dream you are living. There is still time.
--
Clunk42
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
See More Comments =>
Everyone should be trying to get to Heaven, as few do. That's not even how Hell works. No one is happy in Hell: not the devil, not his angels, and not humans. Hell isn't even cold; it's full of fire. Eproctophilia is nothing more than a temptation from the devil. Your attempting to read signs where there are none is not a moral practice. I know that you did not see what you claim to have, and you have even proven that I was correct in saying that you did not see what you claimed to have. Claiming to have seen something that you did not see is lying, and lying about something like the fate of someone's soul is a mortal sin.