Well in order to sue someone for something like that you'd have to have suffered a loss-medical bills, lost work, a physical disfigurement and/or loss of function and so on.
I personally wouldn't run to a doctor unless I was in serious pain or needed stitches or something and even then I doubt I'd sue someone, I guess it would depend more on if I was going to lose function or have some kind of continuous problem or a horrible scar or something.
What would YOU do in this situation?
← View full post
Well in order to sue someone for something like that you'd have to have suffered a loss-medical bills, lost work, a physical disfigurement and/or loss of function and so on.
I personally wouldn't run to a doctor unless I was in serious pain or needed stitches or something and even then I doubt I'd sue someone, I guess it would depend more on if I was going to lose function or have some kind of continuous problem or a horrible scar or something.
--
Anonymous Post Author
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
True. However, for just about any type of accident, you can claim you have back or neck pain, which is impossible to disprove.
Like I wrote in the poll question: "you were NOT seriously harmed".
Of course no one would fault you for suing if you were seriously injured, but that's not what this poll is about.