It's possible and you don't know her any more than I do. Why wouldn't she have government assistance? Australia has had benefits for single parents since the 70's: don't you have them in the US?
Why should she even need it? She shouldn't have gotten pregnant at 15. Where was her mom then? That she did could have been remedied by an abortion. It's not that this is some kind of love child with two loving parents, is it?
Society should not have to bear the responsibility or expense of raising this child's child.
She would need benefits to support herself and her baby: are you suggesting a young mother and her baby should starve? These are human beings we're talking about, one very young and the other newborn. Any civilized society supports its most vulnerable members
Yes absolutely, let them starve. That's surely the correct punishment for getting pregnant at 15. You've got it now. Hell, while we're at it why not kill he mom too. She's a terrible mother. She couldn't even teach her child chastity and to behave with decency.
Or the stupid child could have the baby adopted and none of it would be a necessity. The baby would have a loving, financially stable home, the child (16 year old) would have a chance at a decent life without needing government assistance, the OP probably wouldn't be contemplating leaving and all would be right with the world.
How is any of that not good? Even the abortion, when the alternative is so pathetic?
What to say to step daughter in the hospital after delivery?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
It's possible and you don't know her any more than I do. Why wouldn't she have government assistance? Australia has had benefits for single parents since the 70's: don't you have them in the US?
--
thegypsysailor
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
Why should she even need it? She shouldn't have gotten pregnant at 15. Where was her mom then? That she did could have been remedied by an abortion. It's not that this is some kind of love child with two loving parents, is it?
Society should not have to bear the responsibility or expense of raising this child's child.
--
Ellenna
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
She would need benefits to support herself and her baby: are you suggesting a young mother and her baby should starve? These are human beings we're talking about, one very young and the other newborn. Any civilized society supports its most vulnerable members
--
thegypsysailor
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Yes absolutely, let them starve. That's surely the correct punishment for getting pregnant at 15. You've got it now. Hell, while we're at it why not kill he mom too. She's a terrible mother. She couldn't even teach her child chastity and to behave with decency.
Or the stupid child could have the baby adopted and none of it would be a necessity. The baby would have a loving, financially stable home, the child (16 year old) would have a chance at a decent life without needing government assistance, the OP probably wouldn't be contemplating leaving and all would be right with the world.
How is any of that not good? Even the abortion, when the alternative is so pathetic?
--
Ellenna
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I don't wish to read any more brutality from you: end of "discussion"
--
thegypsysailor
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
It was never a discussion. It was you telling me how wrong I am without offering any constructive help to the OP.