If they're only sexually attracted to objects, then none of the sexual orientations you named apply, unless they're romantically attracted to people. If that's the case, then their orientation depends on their romantic attractions.
It would make them aromantic, but I'm not sure how you would classify their sexuality. Ask them, I suppose. I think they could reasonably identify as asexual, though.
I know that is why I am asking. What would someone like that identify with? It is not put with something. It has no name. So what would they qualify as? I know this is strange but It is driving me mad trying to think of a answer.
Uh, ask them. I know I've read about people like that who identify as asexual, but it might vary from person to person. The terms "object sexuals" and "object sexuality" are used to refer to people like that, but I don't know if those are terms everybody with that kind of fetish identifies with.
If you lack a sex drive or have very little and no motivation to have it with anyone or anything you are asexual. Most of these people have a very strong lust or sexual sensation to objects. So I do not believe that is the case.
I think they have their orientation on the side of the fetish. People with foot fetish only get turned on by the object, not the person it belongs to. If a male was turned on by the sight of male genitalia, then.. uhm.. Seen from one perspective, it's just the object, not the person turning him on. Then again.. eh..
What sexuality do you classify someone with a fetish as?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
If they're only sexually attracted to objects, then none of the sexual orientations you named apply, unless they're romantically attracted to people. If that's the case, then their orientation depends on their romantic attractions.
--
Thearmsofpeace
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
But if they weren't attracted to people... Wouldn't that make them asexual?
--
VioletTrees
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It would make them aromantic, but I'm not sure how you would classify their sexuality. Ask them, I suppose. I think they could reasonably identify as asexual, though.
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Well they still have sexual desire but not actually with a person. So I not sure if its asexual since they indeed have strong sexual desires.
--
VioletTrees
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It depends on how they identify.
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I know that is why I am asking. What would someone like that identify with? It is not put with something. It has no name. So what would they qualify as? I know this is strange but It is driving me mad trying to think of a answer.
--
VioletTrees
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Uh, ask them. I know I've read about people like that who identify as asexual, but it might vary from person to person. The terms "object sexuals" and "object sexuality" are used to refer to people like that, but I don't know if those are terms everybody with that kind of fetish identifies with.
If you lack a sex drive or have very little and no motivation to have it with anyone or anything you are asexual. Most of these people have a very strong lust or sexual sensation to objects. So I do not believe that is the case.
--
Ziggysfan
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I think they have their orientation on the side of the fetish. People with foot fetish only get turned on by the object, not the person it belongs to. If a male was turned on by the sight of male genitalia, then.. uhm.. Seen from one perspective, it's just the object, not the person turning him on. Then again.. eh..