You didn't read my statement then. I said "restrictions of guns to the elite", not gun control. I also said gun control BY A REGIME THAT DOES NOT BELIEVE IN PEACE, does that apply to the E.U.? Not really, the E.U. isn't militant. I think the argument is tangential, and I didn't bring it up, but you just didn't seem to be getting the original poster's point: when common people's guns are taken away, historically it is a prelude to slaughter or repression. Slaves in the U.S. weren't allowed to own guns. Historically, you take away one group's ability to defend themselves for a reason, and it's usually by a psychopath. At least read my comments, I'm fine with disagreement, but not with being taken out of context.
The EU has its wars as well, though it's more peaceful than the US.
But what do you call an elite? The military? The police? Because in that case, I can't see much difference with the EU's gun policies. And it works, as long as you live under a democratic regime.
If by elite you meant an ethnic or socioeconomical group, then yes, I have to agree on that. I reacted because Keeping_up_with_da_kids calls that sort of stuff 'gun control'. And of course, that's not what people mean when they use that term.
This example may seem a little blunt, but I think that the US government is way more oppressive than the EU. And the US doesn't have any gun control. 'Gun freedom' is no guarantee for democracy, nor is it necessary.
What's your opinion on gun control?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
You didn't read my statement then. I said "restrictions of guns to the elite", not gun control. I also said gun control BY A REGIME THAT DOES NOT BELIEVE IN PEACE, does that apply to the E.U.? Not really, the E.U. isn't militant. I think the argument is tangential, and I didn't bring it up, but you just didn't seem to be getting the original poster's point: when common people's guns are taken away, historically it is a prelude to slaughter or repression. Slaves in the U.S. weren't allowed to own guns. Historically, you take away one group's ability to defend themselves for a reason, and it's usually by a psychopath. At least read my comments, I'm fine with disagreement, but not with being taken out of context.
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The EU has its wars as well, though it's more peaceful than the US.
But what do you call an elite? The military? The police? Because in that case, I can't see much difference with the EU's gun policies. And it works, as long as you live under a democratic regime.
If by elite you meant an ethnic or socioeconomical group, then yes, I have to agree on that. I reacted because Keeping_up_with_da_kids calls that sort of stuff 'gun control'. And of course, that's not what people mean when they use that term.
This example may seem a little blunt, but I think that the US government is way more oppressive than the EU. And the US doesn't have any gun control. 'Gun freedom' is no guarantee for democracy, nor is it necessary.