I kind of have a rough theory. And I honestly think the prosecution fucked this one up. They could have nailed her on child neglect, obstruction of justice, and various other child neglect and abuse related charges, hell, maybe even manslaughter, but they were going for the Gold Medal on Bronze Medal worthy evidence. No jury is going to sentence anyone to death over circumstantial evidence.
First off, it was set up way too well. Not nearly enough DNA evidence to convict, as I said, but it was obviously set up to appear to be a kidnapping. I think that the Father was in on it but his daughter (whom I believe may be mentally challenged in some way, or a complete and total ditz) fucked it all up for him. I believe that the child was killed by accident (a trauma injury) or by way of a fit of rage done by the Father or Casey. I honestly think that something is mentally wrong with Casey and she became just an unwitting participant.
I'm thinking that the Father went the distance to cover up for his daughter and she didn't comply as well as he wanted her to. Being a police chief for so long, he has the experience and as far as I am concerned, he did a fantastic job despite her being caught. On the flip side, if he killed the child on purpose or by accident, he was covering for himself, but I believe that ultimately, whether or not he was involved with the child's death, he was directly involved in the events preceeding and I highly, highly doubt that the Mother was in on it.
I think that the Father's intervention would have worked had Casey done as he said, and had she not gone back home and her Mother had not become alerted to the child's disappearance. I believe that the Father made a huge mistake for leaving Casey in charge of the execution of the plan but had all gone as he had planned, it would have appeared that the child was kidnapped, killed and the Mother was just a victim of a horrific creep.
In short, I think the Father had a huge amount of involvement with the plan and might have been the one that killed Caylee too, I believe he had a lot of influence over Casey and she probably believed that he was doing his best to cover for her when really he was covering his own ass.
I also think it is possible that the child was injured during an illegal act on the part of the Father or Casey and became subjected to a mercy killing (by way of the chloroform). Either way, I don't think all avenues of the case were clearly approached and I definitley believe that the media projected this case all sorts of wrong.
A Mother killing her daughter is tragic and heart breaking but a conspiracy to cover up an accident is too complicated for most people to want to listen to while watching TV.
What's your favorite unsolved crime?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I watched some of that case on court TV.
I kind of have a rough theory. And I honestly think the prosecution fucked this one up. They could have nailed her on child neglect, obstruction of justice, and various other child neglect and abuse related charges, hell, maybe even manslaughter, but they were going for the Gold Medal on Bronze Medal worthy evidence. No jury is going to sentence anyone to death over circumstantial evidence.
First off, it was set up way too well. Not nearly enough DNA evidence to convict, as I said, but it was obviously set up to appear to be a kidnapping. I think that the Father was in on it but his daughter (whom I believe may be mentally challenged in some way, or a complete and total ditz) fucked it all up for him. I believe that the child was killed by accident (a trauma injury) or by way of a fit of rage done by the Father or Casey. I honestly think that something is mentally wrong with Casey and she became just an unwitting participant.
I'm thinking that the Father went the distance to cover up for his daughter and she didn't comply as well as he wanted her to. Being a police chief for so long, he has the experience and as far as I am concerned, he did a fantastic job despite her being caught. On the flip side, if he killed the child on purpose or by accident, he was covering for himself, but I believe that ultimately, whether or not he was involved with the child's death, he was directly involved in the events preceeding and I highly, highly doubt that the Mother was in on it.
I think that the Father's intervention would have worked had Casey done as he said, and had she not gone back home and her Mother had not become alerted to the child's disappearance. I believe that the Father made a huge mistake for leaving Casey in charge of the execution of the plan but had all gone as he had planned, it would have appeared that the child was kidnapped, killed and the Mother was just a victim of a horrific creep.
In short, I think the Father had a huge amount of involvement with the plan and might have been the one that killed Caylee too, I believe he had a lot of influence over Casey and she probably believed that he was doing his best to cover for her when really he was covering his own ass.
--
NeuroNeptunian
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I also think it is possible that the child was injured during an illegal act on the part of the Father or Casey and became subjected to a mercy killing (by way of the chloroform). Either way, I don't think all avenues of the case were clearly approached and I definitley believe that the media projected this case all sorts of wrong.
A Mother killing her daughter is tragic and heart breaking but a conspiracy to cover up an accident is too complicated for most people to want to listen to while watching TV.