Yes you have ot get your hands dirty and observers and illusionists are the ones that do just that. You base how much I contribute to society on a comment on a website? You clearly are a moron.
You described yourself as an "observer" and "illusionist", I based my statement on how you described yourself since the question was "what kind of person are you".
You basically told everyone exactly what kind of person you are so I concluded exactly how much you contribute to society through your description.
These forums are open to scrutiny, if you can't take criticism then don't comment.
So you're telling me that someone contributing to society can't be an observer and an illusionist?
My comment was to say what type of person I am and not what I contribute to society, there is a difference.
I described "myself" not my actions, if you seriously can't see the difference then you won't understand the discussion.
So you can base someones contribution to society due to their personality? Find better points.
Here is an example that I will make pretending to be someone else, "Hey, I am a nice person and very generous". What do you think that person does for society? I named two things to do with my personality and I used two things to add for the examples personality so you should have no trouble making a story "in your opinion" about how much this example contributes to society.
I'm open to critisism and if you think I'm offended or can't handle critisism then you obviously haven't been on this website long enough to notice that critisism doesn't effect me, however I find it irritating when people like you use wrong critisism.
Ok, if you look at the answers given, this question is more about your position in society than your personality. Actually, read them carefully and realize that they have nothing to do with personality at all.
With this logic, your original comment which had nothing to do with the question, borders on obsolete.
We can debate forever on what the original question meant, but judging by the answers given, the post is more about work status and whether one has worked hard in their life or not, not your personality and how you perceive yourself to be. Therefore, the example you gave is flawed.
Nope, like I said earlier, my comment towards you was purely personal and had nothing to do with the poll question. Why can't you just admit that you were wrong? Do we really have to keep going back and forth on this?
I admit maybe I was being a dick at first for no reason, but when you started using arguments which you thought were impenetrable, I had to counter them, which I did.
Explain to me my points and then explain how you countered them, you will find that you haven't countered any but believe you have. You weren't being a dick because I don't see anything you have said to be offensive even though that's what you were trying to do, be offensive.
I am a college student, I am studying so that one day I can contrbute to society, does that make me a waste of space? Well according to you if you aren't doing anything for society then you are a negative part of society.
You have said nothing to counter anything I have said but if you want to believe you have then you can continue, you will be the only one that thinks so though.
What kind of Person are You?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Yes you have ot get your hands dirty and observers and illusionists are the ones that do just that. You base how much I contribute to society on a comment on a website? You clearly are a moron.
--
casualcrow
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You described yourself as an "observer" and "illusionist", I based my statement on how you described yourself since the question was "what kind of person are you".
You basically told everyone exactly what kind of person you are so I concluded exactly how much you contribute to society through your description.
These forums are open to scrutiny, if you can't take criticism then don't comment.
--
[Old Memory]
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
So you're telling me that someone contributing to society can't be an observer and an illusionist?
My comment was to say what type of person I am and not what I contribute to society, there is a difference.
I described "myself" not my actions, if you seriously can't see the difference then you won't understand the discussion.
So you can base someones contribution to society due to their personality? Find better points.
Here is an example that I will make pretending to be someone else, "Hey, I am a nice person and very generous". What do you think that person does for society? I named two things to do with my personality and I used two things to add for the examples personality so you should have no trouble making a story "in your opinion" about how much this example contributes to society.
I'm open to critisism and if you think I'm offended or can't handle critisism then you obviously haven't been on this website long enough to notice that critisism doesn't effect me, however I find it irritating when people like you use wrong critisism.
--
casualcrow
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Ok, if you look at the answers given, this question is more about your position in society than your personality. Actually, read them carefully and realize that they have nothing to do with personality at all.
With this logic, your original comment which had nothing to do with the question, borders on obsolete.
We can debate forever on what the original question meant, but judging by the answers given, the post is more about work status and whether one has worked hard in their life or not, not your personality and how you perceive yourself to be. Therefore, the example you gave is flawed.
So far, my criticism is on point.
--
[Old Memory]
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Perhaps I made a mistake? Perhaps I thought it was about personality, perhaps I read the title but not the description?
I made a mistake on what the poll is about but you made the mistake on thinking that my mistake wasn't a mistake.
--
casualcrow
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Nope, like I said earlier, my comment towards you was purely personal and had nothing to do with the poll question. Why can't you just admit that you were wrong? Do we really have to keep going back and forth on this?
I admit maybe I was being a dick at first for no reason, but when you started using arguments which you thought were impenetrable, I had to counter them, which I did.
--
[Old Memory]
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
-
[Old Memory]
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Explain to me my points and then explain how you countered them, you will find that you haven't countered any but believe you have. You weren't being a dick because I don't see anything you have said to be offensive even though that's what you were trying to do, be offensive.
I am a college student, I am studying so that one day I can contrbute to society, does that make me a waste of space? Well according to you if you aren't doing anything for society then you are a negative part of society.
You have said nothing to counter anything I have said but if you want to believe you have then you can continue, you will be the only one that thinks so though.
You countered them did you? Explain to me how you coutered them.