I understood the statement quite well. And I know what the question was. When I said you contribute nothing to society, I meant it, you really contribute nothing to society. It has nothing to do with the question but it was just my personal comment to you.
You are a fool for assuming that my comment to you was in somehow related to the question. Also, observers and illusionists are a thing of the past. In this day and age you have to get you hands dirty to get somewhere in life or you'll be left behind.
Yes you have ot get your hands dirty and observers and illusionists are the ones that do just that. You base how much I contribute to society on a comment on a website? You clearly are a moron.
You described yourself as an "observer" and "illusionist", I based my statement on how you described yourself since the question was "what kind of person are you".
You basically told everyone exactly what kind of person you are so I concluded exactly how much you contribute to society through your description.
These forums are open to scrutiny, if you can't take criticism then don't comment.
So you're telling me that someone contributing to society can't be an observer and an illusionist?
My comment was to say what type of person I am and not what I contribute to society, there is a difference.
I described "myself" not my actions, if you seriously can't see the difference then you won't understand the discussion.
So you can base someones contribution to society due to their personality? Find better points.
Here is an example that I will make pretending to be someone else, "Hey, I am a nice person and very generous". What do you think that person does for society? I named two things to do with my personality and I used two things to add for the examples personality so you should have no trouble making a story "in your opinion" about how much this example contributes to society.
I'm open to critisism and if you think I'm offended or can't handle critisism then you obviously haven't been on this website long enough to notice that critisism doesn't effect me, however I find it irritating when people like you use wrong critisism.
Ok, if you look at the answers given, this question is more about your position in society than your personality. Actually, read them carefully and realize that they have nothing to do with personality at all.
With this logic, your original comment which had nothing to do with the question, borders on obsolete.
We can debate forever on what the original question meant, but judging by the answers given, the post is more about work status and whether one has worked hard in their life or not, not your personality and how you perceive yourself to be. Therefore, the example you gave is flawed.
What kind of Person are You?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Observers and illusionists tend to be the ones with alot of power and money, understand a statment before commenting on it.
--
casualcrow
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I understood the statement quite well. And I know what the question was. When I said you contribute nothing to society, I meant it, you really contribute nothing to society. It has nothing to do with the question but it was just my personal comment to you.
You are a fool for assuming that my comment to you was in somehow related to the question. Also, observers and illusionists are a thing of the past. In this day and age you have to get you hands dirty to get somewhere in life or you'll be left behind.
--
[Old Memory]
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes you have ot get your hands dirty and observers and illusionists are the ones that do just that. You base how much I contribute to society on a comment on a website? You clearly are a moron.
--
casualcrow
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You described yourself as an "observer" and "illusionist", I based my statement on how you described yourself since the question was "what kind of person are you".
You basically told everyone exactly what kind of person you are so I concluded exactly how much you contribute to society through your description.
These forums are open to scrutiny, if you can't take criticism then don't comment.
--
[Old Memory]
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
So you're telling me that someone contributing to society can't be an observer and an illusionist?
My comment was to say what type of person I am and not what I contribute to society, there is a difference.
I described "myself" not my actions, if you seriously can't see the difference then you won't understand the discussion.
So you can base someones contribution to society due to their personality? Find better points.
Here is an example that I will make pretending to be someone else, "Hey, I am a nice person and very generous". What do you think that person does for society? I named two things to do with my personality and I used two things to add for the examples personality so you should have no trouble making a story "in your opinion" about how much this example contributes to society.
I'm open to critisism and if you think I'm offended or can't handle critisism then you obviously haven't been on this website long enough to notice that critisism doesn't effect me, however I find it irritating when people like you use wrong critisism.
--
casualcrow
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Ok, if you look at the answers given, this question is more about your position in society than your personality. Actually, read them carefully and realize that they have nothing to do with personality at all.
With this logic, your original comment which had nothing to do with the question, borders on obsolete.
We can debate forever on what the original question meant, but judging by the answers given, the post is more about work status and whether one has worked hard in their life or not, not your personality and how you perceive yourself to be. Therefore, the example you gave is flawed.
So far, my criticism is on point.
--
[Old Memory]
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Perhaps I made a mistake? Perhaps I thought it was about personality, perhaps I read the title but not the description?
I made a mistake on what the poll is about but you made the mistake on thinking that my mistake wasn't a mistake.