The problem with pedophile prosecution is that in the American justice system, normally a suspect is innocent until proven guilty by more than just a victim's testimony. However, if a child comes forward saying a person (especially a man)(which is gender discriminatory),molested her. The judge will most likely throw the book at the person as the little girl's testimony is as good as physical evidence in the judge's eyes. Think about the female school teacher who attrociacely helped her underage male student feel how good it is to get sexually serviced by her. She got a slap on the wrist. Had it been a male teacher and female student, he would be doing hard time for that one. Say, for example, an adult male didn't buy a little girl the toy she wanted, so she accused him of molesting her to get back at him for not buying her the toy. The man goes to prison (essentially for not buying the little girl her toy) and gets raped and stabbed by bubba. That's a sad way for a girl to be able to get revenge on someone with a few flicks of her twisted tongue in a courtroom. On the flipside of the coin, say for example she was telling the truth. What are they going to do? Dust her little pussy for his fingerprints to prove that his hand was on her? Kinda hard to get physical evidence unless he left bodily fluids on her and they tested her in time to be able to get his DNA as evidence of unwanted sexual contact. In an extreme case, a twisted little girl could find a used condom, put the guys cum on her pee pee, and go in to get a rape kit done so she could burn the guy. The justice system can be exploited what can I say.
What Is Your Stance On Pedophile Prosecution?
← View full post
The problem with pedophile prosecution is that in the American justice system, normally a suspect is innocent until proven guilty by more than just a victim's testimony. However, if a child comes forward saying a person (especially a man)(which is gender discriminatory),molested her. The judge will most likely throw the book at the person as the little girl's testimony is as good as physical evidence in the judge's eyes. Think about the female school teacher who attrociacely helped her underage male student feel how good it is to get sexually serviced by her. She got a slap on the wrist. Had it been a male teacher and female student, he would be doing hard time for that one. Say, for example, an adult male didn't buy a little girl the toy she wanted, so she accused him of molesting her to get back at him for not buying her the toy. The man goes to prison (essentially for not buying the little girl her toy) and gets raped and stabbed by bubba. That's a sad way for a girl to be able to get revenge on someone with a few flicks of her twisted tongue in a courtroom. On the flipside of the coin, say for example she was telling the truth. What are they going to do? Dust her little pussy for his fingerprints to prove that his hand was on her? Kinda hard to get physical evidence unless he left bodily fluids on her and they tested her in time to be able to get his DNA as evidence of unwanted sexual contact. In an extreme case, a twisted little girl could find a used condom, put the guys cum on her pee pee, and go in to get a rape kit done so she could burn the guy. The justice system can be exploited what can I say.