Clunk.
why does it matter???
They work to make it clean, painless, sanitary.
They cancel death penalties if they dont have the right drug cocktail.
Why?
Death is death.
we all will face it.
whether fast, slow, painfull, or quick.
The end result is the same.
Whats wrong with a quillotine, hanging, firing squad.?
Its done, so quick.
Who is served or helped by some
Expensive drug cocktail?
Isnt that really just to make it more palletable to the same folks that want to see the person die.
kinda twisted.
Dio.
I dont spell check when im fucked up.
and. Thats the only times I come here.
psychopath?
I was daiagnosed long before you came along.
So, smarty pants.
prove me wrong.
$20,000 of tax payers money.
or
$x
for a reusable head chopper offer.
The result is,
IDETICAL!
Whats it matter how it happens?
I didn't even notice that spelling error when reading it. How is death by guillotine worse than overly-expensive toxins? This is the problem. People are overly-sensitive to death. The guillotine is a supposedly painless way to die, and so are the "death drugs." so why not use the cheaper option? You think the guillotine is twisted, but you think that torture and limb cutting are fine? That's completely nonsensical.
This has nothing to do with guillotine. This is not what I said. I think SHE is twisted for her view of death.
Killing people is useless and non dissuasive. Crippling is much more effective and dissuasive.
Trust me, if a rapist knows that his next attempt will get him have his dick cut off, rape would be greatly reduced.
While I don't truly understand the point your trying to make, I'll try to explain my stand point. I personallt believe that the death penalty is moral enough to exist. I agree with you about guillotines and hangings. People nowadays are overly sensitive to death. Back in the day, public hangings existed, and people were shoved beneath the guillotines as the crowds gathered to watch. "Executioner" was a job title to be proud of. Now, it's something to be ashamed of for some reason.
My problem with the death penalty is when it's used as a catch-all solution. If someone robs a store, is it worth a hanging? No, it's not. I'm also against prisons as the go-to solution. Prisons are a waste of tax-payers' money. The death penalty should only be used for extreme instances or repeat offenders, prisons should never be used, and fines should cover the rest.
Clunk, how do you fine a person thats broke?
At the same time your fine means nothing to a person of wealth.
Fine d trump or limbaw
$1,000,000 For shooting someone at random.
Its nothing to them.
That said, an honestly poor person doesnt have a dollar to his name.
Try thinking through your replies.
If someone's poor and doesn't have enough money to pay the fine, then you take their stuff. Did you forget about my stance on the death penalty? If someone shoots someone for seemingly no reason, then to the guillotine they go.
No, I think they're saying that we should bring back cheaper methods of execution, such as the guillotine. I also think they're advocating the use of executions as the catch-all crime punishment.
What is your stance on “Death Penalty”?
← View full post
This depends on the circumstances in which the death penalty is enacted.
--
TerriAngel
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Clunk.
why does it matter???
They work to make it clean, painless, sanitary.
They cancel death penalties if they dont have the right drug cocktail.
Why?
Death is death.
we all will face it.
whether fast, slow, painfull, or quick.
The end result is the same.
Whats wrong with a quillotine, hanging, firing squad.?
Its done, so quick.
Who is served or helped by some
Expensive drug cocktail?
Isnt that really just to make it more palletable to the same folks that want to see the person die.
kinda twisted.
--
DIO
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Clunk42
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It's GUILLOTINE not quillotine.
You're twisted. They say girls are supposed to be emotional and more understanding. You just sound like a psychopath.
--
TerriAngel
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Clunk42
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Dio.
I dont spell check when im fucked up.
and. Thats the only times I come here.
psychopath?
I was daiagnosed long before you came along.
So, smarty pants.
prove me wrong.
$20,000 of tax payers money.
or
$x
for a reusable head chopper offer.
The result is,
IDETICAL!
Whats it matter how it happens?
--
DIO
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I won't answer to you anymore unless you improve your english. I'm talking with degenerates.
--
TerriAngel
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Bitch please.
As if I give 2 shits
' weather ' you reply or not.
I didn't even notice that spelling error when reading it. How is death by guillotine worse than overly-expensive toxins? This is the problem. People are overly-sensitive to death. The guillotine is a supposedly painless way to die, and so are the "death drugs." so why not use the cheaper option? You think the guillotine is twisted, but you think that torture and limb cutting are fine? That's completely nonsensical.
--
DIO
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
This has nothing to do with guillotine. This is not what I said. I think SHE is twisted for her view of death.
Killing people is useless and non dissuasive. Crippling is much more effective and dissuasive.
Trust me, if a rapist knows that his next attempt will get him have his dick cut off, rape would be greatly reduced.
While I don't truly understand the point your trying to make, I'll try to explain my stand point. I personallt believe that the death penalty is moral enough to exist. I agree with you about guillotines and hangings. People nowadays are overly sensitive to death. Back in the day, public hangings existed, and people were shoved beneath the guillotines as the crowds gathered to watch. "Executioner" was a job title to be proud of. Now, it's something to be ashamed of for some reason.
My problem with the death penalty is when it's used as a catch-all solution. If someone robs a store, is it worth a hanging? No, it's not. I'm also against prisons as the go-to solution. Prisons are a waste of tax-payers' money. The death penalty should only be used for extreme instances or repeat offenders, prisons should never be used, and fines should cover the rest.
--
TerriAngel
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
NoLifer
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Clunk, how do you fine a person thats broke?
At the same time your fine means nothing to a person of wealth.
Fine d trump or limbaw
$1,000,000 For shooting someone at random.
Its nothing to them.
That said, an honestly poor person doesnt have a dollar to his name.
Try thinking through your replies.
--
Clunk42
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
If someone's poor and doesn't have enough money to pay the fine, then you take their stuff. Did you forget about my stance on the death penalty? If someone shoots someone for seemingly no reason, then to the guillotine they go.
--
TerriAngel
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
What ' stuff ' are you taking from a bag lady?
Her bags?
--
Clunk42
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Well, you'd start by taking their property, and if it's a large enough fine, perhaps their house would be taken.
He trying to say murder ain't no big deal and they deserve a slap on the wrist. Don't you get that from his attitude?
--
Clunk42
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
No, I think they're saying that we should bring back cheaper methods of execution, such as the guillotine. I also think they're advocating the use of executions as the catch-all crime punishment.