Yes sorry I went way off topic. I am not really even talking about guns anymore. My point was simply that if you want to begin to say how to fix schools you can not just blame incident that should have never happened. If you really want to discuss fixing it you have to look at everything not that one little thing. Since that is not the key issues here. Since many things must operate together to run a school. Since these things would not happen if the kids were being supervised. It is like saying we must take away homework or the children will destroy us. You say guns need to be done?
We need a lot more done in schools to make them work better. Guns is not significant enough to blame the failure of school. It has nothing to do with bullying. It has nothing to do with teachers. It has nothing to do with grades. So that one little thing is not fixing anything in school regardless of it possibly repairing things elsewhere. So to act like that is going to completely going to fix the broken schools system is very far reaching. If you are going to talk about repairing school you have to think of everything. This is far more complicated. You can not simplify it so grossly. The structure of a school is not that simple.
The fact you simplify so much and think that would help is irritating. It would be nice if things worked so simply but it really does not. I know that probobly did not make any sense with my ranting and raving.
This also has a lot to do with the psychology of the child and group mentality. You also neglected this fact. Yet think your solution is going to completely repair everything. If you think we should fix the schools we should discourage bullying and maybe focus on helping people. Apposed to the mentality "Illuminating guns is the magical cure" Since that is barely reluvaunt. More needs to be done! Taking away the guns will not take away the amo. These children still suffer and you seem to miss that!
By saying that "Guns" did it you are completely ignoring the issue. By saying this issue is ok you are allowing it to happen a second time. What if the weapon was a knife? What would you say in this case? Would you not think "This kid just stabbed someone"! No you say "We need to out law knives"! You kind of missed the fact someone was kill. Maybe we should be figuring out why he killed. Not where he got the gun. Since honestly I think the fact a kid was driven to kill says something about the school, the parents and the whole community. Since they really could have stopped it. Would you have acted this way if it was a knife?
Who cares if he had a gun! You really think the weapon matters when someone died? Dont most people want to know why? Not "Where did he get it"? Yet you would walk aside and say "Guns are bad" and when your back is turned the violence will continue. That is not the only issue here. You act like it is. Not that I think children should have guns in school. I really do not think they should be allowed any weapon. I just find it infuriating that someone died and all you care about it where the gun comes from. Dont you care about the child who thought to bring it at all? Maybe they could have got help? Yet no one helped them! I wonder why? Everything can be prevented if you pay attention.
Sorry If I sounded harsh by the last comment the reason I left it is because you did and still are misunderstanding of what I wrote. In no way do I think guns are the CAUSE of violence I have agreed several times that it's a bigger problem and I think the reason you think I am simplfy everything is because I am talking only about guns, thats because this whole post is about guns. And I really don't know how you read my previous comments and came away with the idea that I thought the guns are the sole reason of violence
What is your opinion on gun control?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Yes sorry I went way off topic. I am not really even talking about guns anymore. My point was simply that if you want to begin to say how to fix schools you can not just blame incident that should have never happened. If you really want to discuss fixing it you have to look at everything not that one little thing. Since that is not the key issues here. Since many things must operate together to run a school. Since these things would not happen if the kids were being supervised. It is like saying we must take away homework or the children will destroy us. You say guns need to be done?
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
We need a lot more done in schools to make them work better. Guns is not significant enough to blame the failure of school. It has nothing to do with bullying. It has nothing to do with teachers. It has nothing to do with grades. So that one little thing is not fixing anything in school regardless of it possibly repairing things elsewhere. So to act like that is going to completely going to fix the broken schools system is very far reaching. If you are going to talk about repairing school you have to think of everything. This is far more complicated. You can not simplify it so grossly. The structure of a school is not that simple.
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The fact you simplify so much and think that would help is irritating. It would be nice if things worked so simply but it really does not. I know that probobly did not make any sense with my ranting and raving.
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
This also has a lot to do with the psychology of the child and group mentality. You also neglected this fact. Yet think your solution is going to completely repair everything. If you think we should fix the schools we should discourage bullying and maybe focus on helping people. Apposed to the mentality "Illuminating guns is the magical cure" Since that is barely reluvaunt. More needs to be done! Taking away the guns will not take away the amo. These children still suffer and you seem to miss that!
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
By saying that "Guns" did it you are completely ignoring the issue. By saying this issue is ok you are allowing it to happen a second time. What if the weapon was a knife? What would you say in this case? Would you not think "This kid just stabbed someone"! No you say "We need to out law knives"! You kind of missed the fact someone was kill. Maybe we should be figuring out why he killed. Not where he got the gun. Since honestly I think the fact a kid was driven to kill says something about the school, the parents and the whole community. Since they really could have stopped it. Would you have acted this way if it was a knife?
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Who cares if he had a gun! You really think the weapon matters when someone died? Dont most people want to know why? Not "Where did he get it"? Yet you would walk aside and say "Guns are bad" and when your back is turned the violence will continue. That is not the only issue here. You act like it is. Not that I think children should have guns in school. I really do not think they should be allowed any weapon. I just find it infuriating that someone died and all you care about it where the gun comes from. Dont you care about the child who thought to bring it at all? Maybe they could have got help? Yet no one helped them! I wonder why? Everything can be prevented if you pay attention.
--
kingofcarrotflowers
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Sorry If I sounded harsh by the last comment the reason I left it is because you did and still are misunderstanding of what I wrote. In no way do I think guns are the CAUSE of violence I have agreed several times that it's a bigger problem and I think the reason you think I am simplfy everything is because I am talking only about guns, thats because this whole post is about guns. And I really don't know how you read my previous comments and came away with the idea that I thought the guns are the sole reason of violence