What is so wrong with bestiality when the animal is not forced?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

↑ View this comment's parent

← View full post
Comments ( 7 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • No I don't get it! Are you saying that they are not expecting pleasure but actually do get it, or what? I honestly don't understand what you are saying. If that is what you are saying, it doesn't seem to mean anything as an arguement.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Hmm bananaface already said it but according to your original comment I know realised that my argument actually is no argument against yoru original statement that it was not wrong but rude... I don't know if I'd consider it rude but...

      Yeah to the OP: "You didn't do anything wrong!"

      We reached again an end of conversation I guess.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Well, good day then, I s'pose. I had more, but a natural end is a natural end.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Yeah I don't have more on this point and it is useless discussing it anymore^^

          But isn't it another proof that zoophilia is not wrong?

          Comment Hidden ( show )
    • There is a difference. I might have sex purely for the pleasure of it, that would be my purpose for having sex. Or I could be having sex in order to reproduce, but still get pleasure from it.

      Does that make sense?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Okay. I understand. Thank you.

        But I still don't see why it is important. Am I missing something glaringly obvious?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • Exactly you got it^^

        Comment Hidden ( show )