What is so wrong with bestiality when the animal is not forced?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

↑ View this comment's parent

← View full post
Comments ( 8 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • You are right but I guess you won't understand what I am saying^^

    The difference between "sex for pleasure" and "pleasure from having sex" is kinda obvious!
    They have pleasure when having sex but don't have sex for pleasure (except for bonobos, dolphins...)

    Got it?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • No I don't get it! Are you saying that they are not expecting pleasure but actually do get it, or what? I honestly don't understand what you are saying. If that is what you are saying, it doesn't seem to mean anything as an arguement.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Hmm bananaface already said it but according to your original comment I know realised that my argument actually is no argument against yoru original statement that it was not wrong but rude... I don't know if I'd consider it rude but...

        Yeah to the OP: "You didn't do anything wrong!"

        We reached again an end of conversation I guess.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Well, good day then, I s'pose. I had more, but a natural end is a natural end.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • Yeah I don't have more on this point and it is useless discussing it anymore^^

            But isn't it another proof that zoophilia is not wrong?

            Comment Hidden ( show )
      • There is a difference. I might have sex purely for the pleasure of it, that would be my purpose for having sex. Or I could be having sex in order to reproduce, but still get pleasure from it.

        Does that make sense?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Okay. I understand. Thank you.

          But I still don't see why it is important. Am I missing something glaringly obvious?

          Comment Hidden ( show )
        • Exactly you got it^^

          Comment Hidden ( show )