You are right but I guess you won't understand what I am saying^^
The difference between "sex for pleasure" and "pleasure from having sex" is kinda obvious!
They have pleasure when having sex but don't have sex for pleasure (except for bonobos, dolphins...)
No I don't get it! Are you saying that they are not expecting pleasure but actually do get it, or what? I honestly don't understand what you are saying. If that is what you are saying, it doesn't seem to mean anything as an arguement.
Hmm bananaface already said it but according to your original comment I know realised that my argument actually is no argument against yoru original statement that it was not wrong but rude... I don't know if I'd consider it rude but...
There is a difference. I might have sex purely for the pleasure of it, that would be my purpose for having sex. Or I could be having sex in order to reproduce, but still get pleasure from it.
What is so wrong with bestiality when the animal is not forced?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Do you honestly want me to quote this?
"Claim: Bonobos and dolphins are the only animals other than humans who engage in sex for pleasure. True."
That is right. True. Not false. True. I am right. You are wrong.
Incidentally, what is the difference between "sex for pleasure" and "sex because they enjoy it"?
--
DolphinAngel
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
You are right but I guess you won't understand what I am saying^^
The difference between "sex for pleasure" and "pleasure from having sex" is kinda obvious!
They have pleasure when having sex but don't have sex for pleasure (except for bonobos, dolphins...)
Got it?
--
dom180
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No I don't get it! Are you saying that they are not expecting pleasure but actually do get it, or what? I honestly don't understand what you are saying. If that is what you are saying, it doesn't seem to mean anything as an arguement.
--
DolphinAngel
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
bananaface
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Hmm bananaface already said it but according to your original comment I know realised that my argument actually is no argument against yoru original statement that it was not wrong but rude... I don't know if I'd consider it rude but...
Yeah to the OP: "You didn't do anything wrong!"
We reached again an end of conversation I guess.
--
dom180
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Well, good day then, I s'pose. I had more, but a natural end is a natural end.
--
DolphinAngel
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yeah I don't have more on this point and it is useless discussing it anymore^^
But isn't it another proof that zoophilia is not wrong?
There is a difference. I might have sex purely for the pleasure of it, that would be my purpose for having sex. Or I could be having sex in order to reproduce, but still get pleasure from it.
Does that make sense?
--
dom180
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
DolphinAngel
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Okay. I understand. Thank you.
But I still don't see why it is important. Am I missing something glaringly obvious?
Exactly you got it^^