marriage doesn't exactly rule out std's .. especially if one or both of the partners were/are promiscuous before or even during the marriage .. just thought i'd point that out .. lol !
I think the whole point he was making was if EVERYBODY waited til marriage to have sex, and only had sex with their spouse, then STD's wouldn't be a concern.
If, since the beginning of time, people ONLY had sex with their spouse, STD's as we know them wouldn't have developed. The opportunity that these diseases take advantage of wouldn't be there so they would have developed to transmit by other means just like any other disease.
If the only way to get a disease is by blood transfusion, then it's not exactly an STD now is it?
It's still an STD regardless. STD's can develop within animals other than humans and cross contamination can occur.
What defines an STD is the possibility of passing it via sexual contact so even if it's not being transferred that way, it is an STD.
Also, if people only had sex with their spouse since the dawn of time, there's a decent chance none of us would be here today. There were several bottlenecks within human history that if polygamy didn't occur, humanity may have died off. It's a sad truth.
What do you think of this thought?
← View full post
marriage doesn't exactly rule out std's .. especially if one or both of the partners were/are promiscuous before or even during the marriage .. just thought i'd point that out .. lol !
--
wigsplitz
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
I think the whole point he was making was if EVERYBODY waited til marriage to have sex, and only had sex with their spouse, then STD's wouldn't be a concern.
--
q25t
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Blood transfusions are still an issue.
--
wigsplitz
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
If, since the beginning of time, people ONLY had sex with their spouse, STD's as we know them wouldn't have developed. The opportunity that these diseases take advantage of wouldn't be there so they would have developed to transmit by other means just like any other disease.
If the only way to get a disease is by blood transfusion, then it's not exactly an STD now is it?
--
q25t
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It's still an STD regardless. STD's can develop within animals other than humans and cross contamination can occur.
What defines an STD is the possibility of passing it via sexual contact so even if it's not being transferred that way, it is an STD.
Also, if people only had sex with their spouse since the dawn of time, there's a decent chance none of us would be here today. There were several bottlenecks within human history that if polygamy didn't occur, humanity may have died off. It's a sad truth.